Dinámicas de las agendas de investigación en las Jornadas ESOCITE, 1996-2018
; Davyt, Amílcar ; Invernizzi, Noela Otros responsables
Fecha
02/2024
Editorial
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Revista
Sociologias
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1517-4522
eISSN
1807-0337
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El campo académico denominado Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS) en
Latinoamérica ha sido analizado por algunos autores, que establecieron períodos
y ciclos de interés que relacionan las producciones académicas con dinámicas de
institucionalización, configuraciones disciplinarias y períodos políticos. La mayor
parte de estos trabajos ha sido de índole cualitativa, interpretando el conocimiento
producido en el campo a partir de la lectura de la bibliografía existente y de la
experiencia en el propio campo. En términos de abordajes, se inscribieron tanto en
las tradiciones de análisis de documentos como de corte antropológico, muy propios
del campo CTS. En este trabajo aportamos nuevos datos, de tipo cuantitativos,
a partir de la información obtenida en los eventos periódicos de la Asociación
Latinoamericana de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (Congresos
ESOCITE), entendiendo que en este espacio se expresan más dinámicamente las
agendas, los intereses y las producciones de los integrantes del campo. Situamos
estos resultados en diálogo con los trabajos anteriores con vistas a contribuir con
los estudios sobre el campo CTS.
The academic field known as Science, Technology and Society (STS) in Latin America has been analyzed by some authors who established periods and cycles of interest that relate academic productions with dynamics of institutionalization, disciplinary configurations and political periods. Most of these works have been qualitative in nature, interpreting the knowledge produced in the field from a profuse reading of the existing bibliography and the authors’ experience within the field. In terms of approaches, they were inscribed both in the traditions of document analysis and anthropological approaches, which are very typical of the STS field. In this work we build new and quantitative data, based on the information obtained from the periodic conferences of the Latin American Association of Social Studies of Science and Technology (ESOCITE Meetings), understanding it as a space where the agendas, interests and productions of the members of the field are most dynamically expressed. We place these results in dialogue with previous works with a view to contributing to studies on the STS field.
The academic field known as Science, Technology and Society (STS) in Latin America has been analyzed by some authors who established periods and cycles of interest that relate academic productions with dynamics of institutionalization, disciplinary configurations and political periods. Most of these works have been qualitative in nature, interpreting the knowledge produced in the field from a profuse reading of the existing bibliography and the authors’ experience within the field. In terms of approaches, they were inscribed both in the traditions of document analysis and anthropological approaches, which are very typical of the STS field. In this work we build new and quantitative data, based on the information obtained from the periodic conferences of the Latin American Association of Social Studies of Science and Technology (ESOCITE Meetings), understanding it as a space where the agendas, interests and productions of the members of the field are most dynamically expressed. We place these results in dialogue with previous works with a view to contributing to studies on the STS field.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
