Artículo

The politics behind scientific knowledge: Sustainable forest management in Latin America

Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde Icon; Lorenzo, Cristian A. Icon; González, Joel Hernán Icon; Carboni, Lucas Joaquín ; Delgado, Juan Icon; Díaz, Mayra ; Toro Manríquez, Mónica del Rosario Icon; Huertas Herrera, Alejandro Icon

Otros responsables

Fecha

10/2021

Editorial

Elsevier Science

Revista

Forest Policy And Economics

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

1389-9341

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Resumen

Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) seeks to achieve an equilibrium in the economic, social and environmental value of all types of forests. This practice contrasts with the conventional view of managing forests, in which the focus is productivity. Thus, discussions about conventional forest management versus sustainable forest management play a central role in the political and scientific agendas. However, knowledge production and its direction can be biased by different contextual factors such as the way funding is assigned by each country, institutional priorities, and constraints on international cooperation. With this paper, we aim to analyze the contribution of scientific knowledge produced in Latin America within the sustainable forest management research landscape by applying a literature review method (Scopus database for 2015–2018 period). Our results show a similar contribution of national and foreign funds and institutions supporting scientific knowledge about SFM in Latin America. Foreign funding comes mainly from United States of America, and Europe. Latin American authors lead high proportion of scientific articles, and authorship gender was more equitable between male and female researchers. The studies were mostly focused on conservation combined with productivity goals, as well as pure conservation goals, although social studies and restoration goals were also present. Our findings highlight a significant contribution to the paradigm shift in half of the scientific articles. Some studies provided recommendations (specific or general) derived from their results, but we did not detected a clear relationship with funding origin. Moreover, we found that the high contribution to the paradigm shift (studies supporting SFM instead of traditional management) came from institutions based in Latin America. This article aims to contribute to discussions related to scientific funding in Latin America, the North-South scientific relations, and the future of forest in times of climate change.

Colecciones

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa