De radicales a peronistas: la producción de una opción política vivida

Otros responsables
Fecha
02/2016
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Salta. Centro Promocional de Las Investigaciones en Historia y Antropología
Revista
Andes
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0327-1676
eISSN
1668-8090
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Peronistas , Radicales , 1945 , Política Vivida , Radicals , Peronists , Experienced Politics , Mendoza
Resumen
El artículo propone una revisita sobre el tema clásico de los orígenes del peronismo. Se trata de explorar cómo se generaron opciones políticas que condujeron a determinadas adhesiones desde los sentidos y las vivencias de los actores involucrados. Se retoma un estudio de caso puntual: el viraje de los radicales de Mendoza hacia el peronismo en el curso del año 1945. El argumento principal es que esas opciones políticas se produjeron de manera relacional, mediante la interacción, al mismo tiempo que sus protagonistas se producían a sí mismos. Esta perspectiva implica pensar a las opciones políticas no como preexistentes a la sucesión de acontecimientos, sino como una construcción elaborada al fragor de la actividad política y en un contexto heterogéneo e intenso. La hipótesis de trabajo señala que si, en ese proceso, actores en análogas condiciones efectuaron recorridos divergentes fue porque atribuyeron sentidos a sus acciones de manera diferente y porque las formas cotidianas de la política los fueron moldeando de manera contrastiva.
This article aims to revisit the classic topic of the origins of Peronism. It explores how political options were made trying to capture the particular meanings they had for the actors involved and the experiences that led them to choose whom they support. The case studied refers Radicals who became Peronists in the province of Mendoza during 1945. The principal argument is that many political options occurred in a relational manner through interaction, while their protagonists produced themselves. The paths to take, from this perspective, did not preexist as such to the particular sequence of events. They were created in political activity and in a context, which was lived intensely and heterogeneously. The hypothesis states that if actors in similar conditions made divergent choices it is because they attributed different meanings to what they were doing and because the everyday forms of politics shaped them in a contrastive manner.
This article aims to revisit the classic topic of the origins of Peronism. It explores how political options were made trying to capture the particular meanings they had for the actors involved and the experiences that led them to choose whom they support. The case studied refers Radicals who became Peronists in the province of Mendoza during 1945. The principal argument is that many political options occurred in a relational manner through interaction, while their protagonists produced themselves. The paths to take, from this perspective, did not preexist as such to the particular sequence of events. They were created in political activity and in a context, which was lived intensely and heterogeneously. The hypothesis states that if actors in similar conditions made divergent choices it is because they attributed different meanings to what they were doing and because the everyday forms of politics shaped them in a contrastive manner.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc
