Instituciones políticas y análisis comparativo: una lectura del consenso ortodoxo en la ciencia política contemporánea
; Cunial, Santiago Luján 
Otros responsables
Fecha
07/2021
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Revista
Ciencia Política
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1909-230X
eISSN
2389-7481
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Desde sus orígenes, la ciencia política estudia las instituciones de gobierno y la forma como se produce y distribuye el poder en una sociedad; esto lo hace de manera comparada. El artículo se propone examinar el vínculo no necesario, pero muy influyente, entre las instituciones políticas y el análisis comparativo. Su consolidación resultó del cambio que produjo en la ciencia política la irrupción del conductismo y la teoría de la elección racional, y sentó las bases para renovar el estudio de las instituciones políticas y privilegiar la política comparada como estrategia metodológica. El artículo argumenta que la reconfiguración del vínculo entre instituciones políticas y política comparada, a partir de las últimas décadas del siglo XX, ha establecido una suerte de consenso ortodoxo en la ciencia política, que supone un modelo de ciencia empírica hipotético-deductiva y una estrategia metodológica comparativa aplicada a este objeto de estudio específico para la explicación politológica.
Since its inception, political science has been studying the institutions of government and the way in which power is produced and distributed in a society, and it does so in a comparative manner. This article aims to examine the not necessary but very influential link between political institutions and comparative analysis. Its consolidation resulted from the change that the irruption of the behaviorism and the theory of the rational election produced in the political science, laying down bases to renew the study of the political institutions and to privilege the comparative politics like methodological strategy. The article argues that the reconfiguration of the link between political institutions and comparative politics, from the last decades of the twentieth century, has established a kind of “orthodox consensus” in political science that assumes a model of empirical hypothetical-deductive science and a methodological strategy comparative applied to this specific study object for the political explanation.
Since its inception, political science has been studying the institutions of government and the way in which power is produced and distributed in a society, and it does so in a comparative manner. This article aims to examine the not necessary but very influential link between political institutions and comparative analysis. Its consolidation resulted from the change that the irruption of the behaviorism and the theory of the rational election produced in the political science, laying down bases to renew the study of the political institutions and to privilege the comparative politics like methodological strategy. The article argues that the reconfiguration of the link between political institutions and comparative politics, from the last decades of the twentieth century, has established a kind of “orthodox consensus” in political science that assumes a model of empirical hypothetical-deductive science and a methodological strategy comparative applied to this specific study object for the political explanation.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
