La sistematización en Trabajo Social y la epistemología feminista del punto de vista. Diálogos sobre la producción de conocimiento sustentada en experiencias

Otros responsables
Fecha
01/2021
Editorial
Universidad del Valle
Revista
Prospectiva
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0122-1213
eISSN
2389-993X
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El presente artículo discute sobre la sistematización desde una óptica singular: la perspectiva de la epistemología feminista del punto de vista, por su proximidad con algunas inquietudes que nos planteamos en Trabajo Social. Se trata de un análisis en el que los procedimientos propios del trabajo teórico de las ciencias sociales son acompañados por nuestras experiencias de investigación, docencia y sistematización en el campo del Trabajo Social. El argumento central de artículo sostiene que, desde una posición epistemológica feminista, el desapego y la distancia más que una prueba de objetividad y validez resultan de un prejuicio cientificista. La subjetividad no es vista como un obstáculo, sino como elemento constitutivo de la producción de conocimiento. Así, uno de los rasgos distintivos de la sistematización de experiencias -quien reflexiona e interpreta es el/la protagonista que experimenta- deja de ser un obstáculo para su validez y relevancia, para convertirse en una posibilidad de aportar un punto de vista singular: la perspectiva de quienes con su práctica cotidiana se insertan en un escenario que, a la vez, pretenden conocer y abordar reflexivamente. En las conclusiones destacamos que algunas características de la sistematización de experiencias que han sido consideradas problemáticas para la producción de conocimiento, pueden comprenderse como potencialidades si dejamos de lado las perspectivas androcéntricas.
This article discusses systematization from a singular perspective. The debate revolves around the status of experience in the production of scientific knowledge, from the perspective of feminist standpoint epistemologies, because of the proximity we find in these arguments with some concerns we raise in Social Work. In methodological terms, we do a work of theoretical reflection. This consists of a situated analysis where the typical procedures of the theoretical work of social sciences are accompanied by our experiences in research, teaching, and systematization in the field of Social Work. The central argument of the article holds that, from a feminist epistemological position, detachment and distance are a scientific prejudice rather than a proof of objectivity and validity, Subjectivity is seen not as an obstacle but as a constituent element of knowledge production. Thus, one of the distinctive traits of systematization of experiences – that who reflects and interprets is the very subject who is having the experience - ceases to be an obstacle to its validity and relevance and turns into a possibility to contribute a singular standpoint: the perspective of those who, with their daily practice, insert themselves into a scenario which they, in turn, claim to know and reflectively approach. In the conclusions, we highlight that some characteristics of experience systematization, which have been considered problematic to knowledge production, can be understood as potentialities if we put androcentric perspectives aside.
This article discusses systematization from a singular perspective. The debate revolves around the status of experience in the production of scientific knowledge, from the perspective of feminist standpoint epistemologies, because of the proximity we find in these arguments with some concerns we raise in Social Work. In methodological terms, we do a work of theoretical reflection. This consists of a situated analysis where the typical procedures of the theoretical work of social sciences are accompanied by our experiences in research, teaching, and systematization in the field of Social Work. The central argument of the article holds that, from a feminist epistemological position, detachment and distance are a scientific prejudice rather than a proof of objectivity and validity, Subjectivity is seen not as an obstacle but as a constituent element of knowledge production. Thus, one of the distinctive traits of systematization of experiences – that who reflects and interprets is the very subject who is having the experience - ceases to be an obstacle to its validity and relevance and turns into a possibility to contribute a singular standpoint: the perspective of those who, with their daily practice, insert themselves into a scenario which they, in turn, claim to know and reflectively approach. In the conclusions, we highlight that some characteristics of experience systematization, which have been considered problematic to knowledge production, can be understood as potentialities if we put androcentric perspectives aside.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
