Neoliberalismo y Neo-autoritarismo

Otros responsables
Fecha
11/2018
Editorial
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista
Política y Sociedad
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1130-8001
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Con la crisis que estalló en el mercado financiero en 2008, muchos científicos sociales diagnosticaron un creciente “malestar en la globalización” (Stiglitz, 2007). Este malestar trajo asociados, junto con los padecimientos que provoca directamente la crisis económica, una serie de fenómenos muy diferentes: el resurgimiento del nacionalismo, la ruptura de pactos de solidaridad institucionalizados, la lucha en torno a la legitimidad del estado de bienestar, la creciente influencia de discursos públicos y partidos políticos racistas, la movilización política de la xenofobia, una nueva oleada de críticas a las desigualdades sociales, así como nuevas demandas de protección social orientadas a contener los efectos más dañinos del capitalismo desregulado. La hipótesis que quisiera defender en este trabajo afirma que, en el contexto de este malestar con la globalización, se han consolidado nuevas formas de autoritarismo social que constituyen una constelación específica de fenómenos, y que precisan ser investigados en su particularidad.
With the crisis that broke out in the financial market in 2008 many social scientists diagnosed a growing "discontent in globalization" (Stiglitz, 2007). This discontent brings with it a series of very different phenomena: the resurgence of nationalism, the breaking off of institutionalized solidarity pacts, the struggle over the legitimacy of the welfare state, the growing influence of racist public discourses and political parties, the political mobilization of xenophobia, a new wave of criticism of social inequalities, as well as new demands for social protection that may confront the most damaging effects of unregulated capitalism. The hypothesis that I would like to defend in this paper states that, in the context of this discontent with globalization, new forms of social authoritarianism have been consolidated, constituting a specific constellation of phenomena, which need to be investigated in their particularity.
With the crisis that broke out in the financial market in 2008 many social scientists diagnosed a growing "discontent in globalization" (Stiglitz, 2007). This discontent brings with it a series of very different phenomena: the resurgence of nationalism, the breaking off of institutionalized solidarity pacts, the struggle over the legitimacy of the welfare state, the growing influence of racist public discourses and political parties, the political mobilization of xenophobia, a new wave of criticism of social inequalities, as well as new demands for social protection that may confront the most damaging effects of unregulated capitalism. The hypothesis that I would like to defend in this paper states that, in the context of this discontent with globalization, new forms of social authoritarianism have been consolidated, constituting a specific constellation of phenomena, which need to be investigated in their particularity.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
