La conversación verbal mapuche y la investigación antropológica en co-labor: Condiciones para la producción intersubjetiva, interepistémica e interexistencial de conocimientos
; Ramos, Ana Margarita 
Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2024
Editorial
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista
Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1695-9752
eISSN
1578-9705
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Tomando como punto de partida una experiencia de investigación en co-labor con dos interlocutores mapuche, este artículo explora aprendizajes derivados de la propuesta que nos estaban realizando: básicamente, embarcarnos en la producción intersubjetiva, interepistémica e interexistencial de conocimientos. Intersubjetiva, porque la meta debía pasar por transformar/completar nuestras comprensiones y personas a partir de la interacción. Interepistémica, en la medida en que requería abrirnos a reconocer no tanto otros conocimientos sino otras formas de conocer. Interexistencial, pues nos iría exponiendo la opacidad de ciertos bordes ontológicos según los cuales la práctica del conversar puede, en su hacerse, involucrar –al menos para algunos-- personas humanas y no humanas. Sobre esta base, mapuche, apuntamos a intervenir en debates más amplios sobre ciertos mandatos y concepciones extendidas del quehacer antropológico contemporáneo.
Taking as a starting point a research experience in collaboration with two Mapuche interlocutors, this article explores learning derived from the proposal they were making to us: basically, embarking on the intersubjective, interepistemic and interexistential production of knowledge. Intersubjective, because the goal had to be to transform/complete our understandings and selves in and through the interaction. Interepistemic, to the extent that it had to open ourselves to recognize not so much other knowledge but other ways of knowing. Interexistential, since it would expose us to the opacity of certain ontological borders according to which the practice of conversation can, in its being done, involve —at least for some— living human persons and non-human beings. On this basis, we aim to intervene in broader debates about certain mandates and extended conceptions of contemporary anthropological work.
Taking as a starting point a research experience in collaboration with two Mapuche interlocutors, this article explores learning derived from the proposal they were making to us: basically, embarking on the intersubjective, interepistemic and interexistential production of knowledge. Intersubjective, because the goal had to be to transform/complete our understandings and selves in and through the interaction. Interepistemic, to the extent that it had to open ourselves to recognize not so much other knowledge but other ways of knowing. Interexistential, since it would expose us to the opacity of certain ontological borders according to which the practice of conversation can, in its being done, involve —at least for some— living human persons and non-human beings. On this basis, we aim to intervene in broader debates about certain mandates and extended conceptions of contemporary anthropological work.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
