Artículo

Evaluation of four chatbots in autoimmune liver disease: A comparative analysis

Daza, Jimmy ; Bezerra, Lucas Soares ; Santamaría, Laura ; Rueda Esteban, Roberto ; Bantel, Heike ; Girala, Marcos ; Ebert, Matthias ; Van Bömmel, Florian ; Geier, Andreas ; Aldana, Andres Gomez ; Yau, Kevin ; Alvares da Silva, Mario ; Peck Radosavljevic, Markus ; Ridruejo, Ezequiel Icon; Weinmann, Arndt ; Teufel, Andreas

Otros responsables

Fecha

01/2025

Editorial

Mexican Association of Hepatology

Revista

Annals of Hepatology

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

1665-2681

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Palabras clave

Resumen

Introduction and objectives: Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are rare and require precise evaluation, which is often challenging for medical providers. Chatbots are innovative solutions to assist healthcare professionals in clinical management. In our study, ten liver specialists systematically evaluated four chatbots to determine their utility as clinical decision support tools in the field of AILDs.Materials and methods: We constructed a 56-question questionnaire focusing on AILD evaluation, diagnosis, and management of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). Four chatbots -ChatGPT 3.5, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Bard- were presented with the questions in their free tiers in December 2023. Responses underwent critical evaluation by ten liver specialists using a standardized 1 to 10 Likert scale. The analysis included mean scores, the number of highest-rated replies, and the identification of common shortcomings in chatbots performance.Results: Among the assessed chatbots, specialists rated Claude highest with a mean score of 7.37 (SD = 1.91), followed by ChatGPT (7.17, SD = 1.89), Microsoft Copilot (6.63, SD = 2.10), and Google Bard (6.52, SD = 2.27). Claude also excelled with 27 best-rated replies, outperforming ChatGPT (20), while Microsoft Copilot and Google Bard lagged with only 6 and 9, respectively. Common deficiencies included listing details over specific advice, limited dosing options, inaccuracies for pregnant patients, insufficient recent data, over-reliance on CT and MRI imaging, and inadequate discussion regarding off-label use and fibrates in PBC treatment. Notably, internet access for Microsoft Copilot and Google Bard did not enhance precision compared to pre-trained models.Conclusions: Chatbots hold promise in AILD support, but our study underscores key areas for improvement. Refinement is needed in providing specific advice, accuracy, and focused up-to-date information. Addressing these shortcomings is essential for enhancing the utility of chatbots in AILD management, guiding future development, and ensuring their effectiveness as clinical decision-support tools.

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by