Comparative Evidence on Urban Land-Use Regulation Bureaucracy in Developing Countries

Otros responsables
Fecha
2016
Editorial
University of Pennsylvania
Revista
Título del libro
Slums: How Informal Real State Markets Work
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
eISSN
ISBN
9780812247947
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
The organization of the chapter is as follows. We present a literature review followed by a description of data. We then assess variation in regulatory bureaucracy around the world. We pay special attention to Brazil and India as they provide a contrast in terms of the relationship between regulation and informality. India imposes notoriously restrictive regulations on urban densities (Bertaud and Brueckner 2005; Sridhar 2010), whereas Brazilian cities are well known for their efforts to incorporate favelas into a more formal system (Maia 1995; Handzic 2010). In the chapter?s last section, we present two sets of statistical associations: one between different aspects of regulatory bureaucracy (those governing construction permits and those governing property registration) and the other between regulation and factors often associated with strict regulations.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
