Reflexiones metodológicas a partir del dialogo de (y entre) quehaceres: Interpelaciones y ambitos disciplinares diversos
; Guiñazu, Veronica Samanta 
Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2024
Editorial
Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Escuela de Antropología
Revista
Antropologías del sur
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0719-4498
eISSN
0719-5532
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
A partir de la reflexión sobre dos experiencias de ejercicio profesional antropológico en ámbitos no-académicos transitadas por las autoras, el artículo problematiza en torno a algunas de las complejidades y desafíos de orden teórico-metodológico que se ven implicadas en esta tarea. De este modo, a partir del análisis etnográfico de distintos materiales aportados por las investigaciones recuperadas así como del corpus de materiales generados en los diálogos sostenidos entre las autoras en relación a ejes diversos -tales como posicionamiento, compromisos, prácticas-, el objetivo del texto es contribuir a una discusión poco abordada en la historia disciplinar argentina. Aquella que se pregunta -y disputa- por el reconocimiento y alcance epistemológico de lo que denominan una “antropología practicada”, caracterizada por un hacer disciplinar “impuro”, contradictorio, tensionado y no ceñido al corset academicista, aunque no por ello menos comprometido ni con sus principios epistemológicos, ni con su tiempo y contexto histórico.
Based on the reflection on two experiences of anthropological professional practice in non-academic fields experienced by the authors, the article problematizes some of the complexities and challenges of a theoretical-methodological order that are involved in this task. In this way, based on the ethnographic analysis of different materials provided by the recovered research as well as the corpus of materials generated in the dialogues held between the authors in relation to various axes –such as positioning, commitments, practices–, the objective of the text is to contribute to a discussion little addressed in Argentine disciplinary history. That which questions –and disputes– the recognition and epistemological scope of what they call a “practiced anthropology”, characterized by an “impure” disciplinary practice, contradictory, tense and not limited to the academic corset, although no less committed or with its epistemological principles, nor with its time and historical context.
Based on the reflection on two experiences of anthropological professional practice in non-academic fields experienced by the authors, the article problematizes some of the complexities and challenges of a theoretical-methodological order that are involved in this task. In this way, based on the ethnographic analysis of different materials provided by the recovered research as well as the corpus of materials generated in the dialogues held between the authors in relation to various axes –such as positioning, commitments, practices–, the objective of the text is to contribute to a discussion little addressed in Argentine disciplinary history. That which questions –and disputes– the recognition and epistemological scope of what they call a “practiced anthropology”, characterized by an “impure” disciplinary practice, contradictory, tense and not limited to the academic corset, although no less committed or with its epistemological principles, nor with its time and historical context.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
