Incipit Vita Nova: renovación filosófica a través de las revistas de la nueva generación (1917-1930)

Otros responsables
Fecha
03/2025
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Humanidades. Centro de Letras Hispanoamericanas
Revista
Estudios de Teoría Literaria
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2313-9676
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En los estudios filosóficos, la autodenominada reacción antipositivista se adjudicó una tarea profesionalizadora. Dentro del proceso de la Reforma universitaria, descubrir la filosofía significaba sobre todo separarla de las ciencias. Y no mucho más. La “nueva generación” hablaba de un corte filosófico radical que era capaz de abrirse a una gran cantidad de desarrollos teóricos y a la vez mostraba una falta de coordenadas concretas para definir sus propios intereses. No obstante, esta tarea conllevó una fuerte politización del área de estudio. Discutir el acuerdo positivista incluyó también discutir un acuerdo liberal que se consideraba hegemónico. A partir de 1917 estudiantes y egresados interesados por la filosofía impulsaron revistas con intervenciones políticas, históricas y teóricas. Sus inscripciones filosóficas fueron heterogéneas, pero estas discontinuadas plataformas de difusión constituyen entonces el material sobre el cual trazar un marco de intereses filosóficos y sus derroteros.
In Argentine philosophical studies, the self-designated anti-positivist reaction played a key role in the professionalization of the field. Within the context of the University Reform, the task of discovering philosophy largely entailed distinguishing it from the sciences—and little more than that. The "new generation" thus advocated for a radical philosophical break that, in itself, was seen as capable of fostering significant theoretical developments, even while exposing a lack of concrete coordinates to define its own concerns. Nonetheless, this process involved a strong politicization of the field. Challenging the positivist consensus also meant confronting a liberal framework that was regarded as hegemonic. From 1917 onward, students and graduates engaged in philosophy promoted journals that offered political, historical, and theoretical interventions. While their philosophical affiliations were heterogeneous, these fragmented platforms of dissemination provide the material upon which to trace the evolution of philosophical interests and their developments.
In Argentine philosophical studies, the self-designated anti-positivist reaction played a key role in the professionalization of the field. Within the context of the University Reform, the task of discovering philosophy largely entailed distinguishing it from the sciences—and little more than that. The "new generation" thus advocated for a radical philosophical break that, in itself, was seen as capable of fostering significant theoretical developments, even while exposing a lack of concrete coordinates to define its own concerns. Nonetheless, this process involved a strong politicization of the field. Challenging the positivist consensus also meant confronting a liberal framework that was regarded as hegemonic. From 1917 onward, students and graduates engaged in philosophy promoted journals that offered political, historical, and theoretical interventions. While their philosophical affiliations were heterogeneous, these fragmented platforms of dissemination provide the material upon which to trace the evolution of philosophical interests and their developments.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
