Monitoreo terapéutico de indinavir en niños con infección HIV

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2005
Editorial
Fundación Hospital de Pediatría
Revista
Medicina Infantil
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0328-0160
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Objetivos: E! objetivo de este trabajo es realizar una evaluación de los resultados del monitoreo terapéutico (MT) de las concentraciones plasmáticas (Cp) de indinavir, realizados durante la práctica clínica, en pacientes pediátricos que reciben TARV en esquemas que contienen indinavir más rito-navir. Métodos: Fueron incluidos 13 pacientes en seguimiento ambulatorio en el Hospital de Pediatría Juan P. Garrahan, a los que se le realizaron dos determinaciones de Cp de indinavir: un "valle" y un "pico" (una hora posterior a la dosis). La dosis estimada que reciben los pacientes es de 250 mg/mV12hs. Resultados: ocho d* los trece pacientes presentaron niveles sutaterapéuticos, de los cuales dos tuvieron niveles no detectables (mediana: 0,73 |ig/mt_). El rango terapéutico propuesto para el indinavir está entre 0,150 y 10 |ig/ml_, aunque estos valores fueron definidos para la población adulta. Uno rje los pacientes presentó niveles superiores a dicho rango (14,6 jig/mU Conclusión: trabajos previos sugieren un régimen de 400 mg/rnj indinavir más 125 mg/m* ritonavir cada 12 horas. Debido a que datos previos de pacientes de nuestro hospital habían mostrado que pautas similares podían resultar en niveles plasmáticos elevados asociados a manifestaciones tóxicas, la pauta inicial utilizada fue de 250 mg/ m2 indinavir más 100 mg/mj ritonavir cada doce horas. El MT de indinavir mostró sin embargo que la administración de esta pauta resultó en niveles subterapéuticos. Aun cuando el indinavir se asocia al ritonavir la alta variabilidad observada en los niveles plasmáticos de indinavir sugieren la necesidad de monitorizarlo.
Objectives: The aim of this work is to evaluate the results of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assessed in the course of clinical routine practice in pediatric patients whose antiretroviral treatment includes indinavir boosted with ritonavir. Methods: 13 ambulatory patients receiving indinavir plus ritonavir (median: 38 months of treatment) were included in this work. In these patients, two plasmatic levels of indinavir were determined by HPLC: a “trough” level and a “peak” level (one hour after the corresponding dose). The average dosage of indinavir was 250 mg/m2/12hs. Results: Eight of thirteen patients yielded subtherapeutic levels with 2 patients with non detectable levels (median troughs: 0.73 µg/mL). One patient showed a peak level over the range (14.6 µg/mL). Median peak observed was 3.8 µg/ml. The therapeutic range proposed for indinavir was 0.150 and 10 µg/mL for troughs and peaks respectively, even though these levels were determined for adult patients. Conclusions: Although pediatric dosage of indinavir boosted with ritonavir is not yet defined, previous works suggested a dosage regimen of 400 mg/m2 indinavir plus 125 mg/ m2 ritonavir every 12 hours. Since previous assessments of plasmatic levels of patients from our hospital had shown that these dosage regimens could lead to high levels associated with toxic reactions, the initial scheme consisted of 250 mg/ m2 indinavir plus 100 mg/m2 ritonavir every 12 hours. TDM of indinavir showed that this regimen led to sub – therapeutic levels in this patients. Even though indinavir is boosted with ritonavir, the high variability observed in the plasmatic levels suggests that TDM of indinavir is advisable.
Objectives: The aim of this work is to evaluate the results of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assessed in the course of clinical routine practice in pediatric patients whose antiretroviral treatment includes indinavir boosted with ritonavir. Methods: 13 ambulatory patients receiving indinavir plus ritonavir (median: 38 months of treatment) were included in this work. In these patients, two plasmatic levels of indinavir were determined by HPLC: a “trough” level and a “peak” level (one hour after the corresponding dose). The average dosage of indinavir was 250 mg/m2/12hs. Results: Eight of thirteen patients yielded subtherapeutic levels with 2 patients with non detectable levels (median troughs: 0.73 µg/mL). One patient showed a peak level over the range (14.6 µg/mL). Median peak observed was 3.8 µg/ml. The therapeutic range proposed for indinavir was 0.150 and 10 µg/mL for troughs and peaks respectively, even though these levels were determined for adult patients. Conclusions: Although pediatric dosage of indinavir boosted with ritonavir is not yet defined, previous works suggested a dosage regimen of 400 mg/m2 indinavir plus 125 mg/ m2 ritonavir every 12 hours. Since previous assessments of plasmatic levels of patients from our hospital had shown that these dosage regimens could lead to high levels associated with toxic reactions, the initial scheme consisted of 250 mg/ m2 indinavir plus 100 mg/m2 ritonavir every 12 hours. TDM of indinavir showed that this regimen led to sub – therapeutic levels in this patients. Even though indinavir is boosted with ritonavir, the high variability observed in the plasmatic levels suggests that TDM of indinavir is advisable.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
