Sobre la categoría de “mito político” en la obra de Ernst Cassirer

Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2024
Editorial
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista
Revista de Filosofía
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0034-8244
eISSN
1988-284X
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Resumen
En El mito del Estado, publicado póstumamente en 1946, Ernst Cassirer analiza la confluencia entre mito, técnica y política, que se hace manifiesta en el fenómeno nacionalsocialista. Sin embargo, el uso de la categoría de “mito político” por parte del filósofo alemán, ha sido objeto de críticas por algunos intérpretes de su obra. El presente artículo se propone, en primer lugar, reconstruir estas críticas, con el propósito de evaluar, en segundo lugar, los alcances efectivos de dicho cuestionamiento, así como el posible rendimiento hermenéutico y actualidad de la categoría de “mito político” de Cassirer.
In The Myth of the State, a work published posthumously in 1946, Ernst Cassirer analyzes the confluence between myth, technique and politics, manifesting in the National Socialist phenomenon. Starting from a recovery of theoretical concepts developed during the interwar period and under the guidance of his critical phenomenology, Cassirer faces the challenge of understanding the logic of the Nazi political myth. However, the use of the category of “political myth” by the German philosopher has been criticized by some interpreters of his work. This article aims, firstly, to reconstruct these critical arguments and, secondly, to evaluate the effective scope of this questioning, as well as the possible hermeneutic performance and relevance of Cassirer’s category of “political myth.”
In The Myth of the State, a work published posthumously in 1946, Ernst Cassirer analyzes the confluence between myth, technique and politics, manifesting in the National Socialist phenomenon. Starting from a recovery of theoretical concepts developed during the interwar period and under the guidance of his critical phenomenology, Cassirer faces the challenge of understanding the logic of the Nazi political myth. However, the use of the category of “political myth” by the German philosopher has been criticized by some interpreters of his work. This article aims, firstly, to reconstruct these critical arguments and, secondly, to evaluate the effective scope of this questioning, as well as the possible hermeneutic performance and relevance of Cassirer’s category of “political myth.”
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
