Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies
; Douven, Elles ; Downing, Marina G. ; Feinstein, Anthony ; Ferentinos, Panagiotis P. ; Fischer, Felix H. ; Flint, Alastair J. ; Fujimori, Maiko ; Gallagher, Pamela ; Gandy, Milena ; Goebel, Simone ; Grassi, Luigi ; Härter, Martin ; Jenewein, Josef ; Jetté, Nathalie ; Julião, Miguel ; Kim, Jae Min ; Kim, Sung Wan ; Kjærgaard, Marie ; Köhler, Sebastian ; Loosman, Wim L. ; Löwe, Bernd ; Martin Santos, Rocio ; Massardo, Loreto ; Matsuoka, Yutaka ; Mehnert, Anja ; Michopoulos, Ioannis ; Misery, Laurent ; Navines, Ricard ; O'Donnell, Meaghan L. ; Öztürk, Ahmet ; Peceliuniene, Jurate ; Pintor, Luis ; Ponsford, Jennie L. ; Quinn, Terence J ; Reme, Silje E. ; Reuter, Katrin ; Rooney, Alasdair G. ; Sánchez González, Roberto ; Schwarzbold, Marcelo L. ; Senturk Cankorur, Vesile ; Haaban, Juwita ; Sharpe, Louise ; Sharpe, Michael ; Simard, Sébastien ; Singer, Susanne ; tafford, Lesley ; Stone, Jon ; Sultan, Serge ; Teixeira, Antonio L. ; Tiringer, Istvan ; Turner, Alyna ; Walker, Jane ; Walterfang, Mark ; Wang, Liang Jen ; White, Jennifer ; Wong, Dana K. ; Benedetti, Andrea ; Thombs, Brett D. Otros responsables
Fecha
02/2020
Editorial
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Revista
Journal Of Psychosomatic Research
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0022-3999
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Resumen
Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Methods: Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores. Results: There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)). Conclusion: Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
