El ordenamiento territorial y el diálogo entre cosmovisiones sobre los territorios

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2024
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de La Rioja
Revista
Abordajes
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2346-8998
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En el marco del avance de la ofensiva extractiva sobre los territorios, surgen nuevas y renovadas formas de ordenar los territorios para la producción de valor. Considerando, por un lado, la dimensión epistemológica y ontológica sobre la que se funda la modernidad/ colonialidad misma y, por otro lado, considerando un nuevo repertorio de dispositivos expropiatorios que se despliegan en los territorios hasta ahora considerados marginales, es que nos preguntamos por el papel que juegan los procesos de Ordenamiento Territorial en estas dinámicas. Tomando el Proyecto de Ordenamiento Territorial de la provincia de La Rioja, reflexionamos: ¿Pueden dialogar diferentes cosmovisiones en los procesos de ordenamiento del territorio atravesados por la epistemología del desarrollo? A partir de esta pregunta inicial y del análisis desplegado, resaltamos la importancia de recuperar las perspectivas críticas con respecto al territorio en tanto atravesado por procesos de conflictividad y contradicción. Además, destacamos la potencia que ofrece considerar la dimensión ontológica en estas propuestas de construcción colectiva para realmente abrirnos a otras posibilidades de pensarnos en el territorio y otros criterios de (des)orden que no estén atravesados epistemológicamente por las líneas hegemónicas del desarrollo.
Amid the ongoing expansion of the extractivist offensive over territories, new and renewed forms of spatial organization are emerging in the service of value production. This phenomenon calls for a critical examination of the territorial ordering processes that accompany and enable such transformations. On one hand, these processes are grounded in the epistemological and ontological assumptions that underpin modernity/coloniality. On the other, they are characterized by the deployment of a novel repertoire of expropriatory mechanisms in territories historically deemed peripheral. In this context, we interrogate the role played by territorial planning in reinforcing—or challenging—these dynamics. Taking the Territorial Planning Project of the Province of La Rioja as a point of departure, we ask: To what extent is it possible for multiple worldviews to engage in meaningful dialogue within planning processes that are deeply embedded in the epistemology of development? From this inquiry, and through the analysis developed, we underline the importance of recovering critical perspectives on territory—as a space shaped by tensions, conflicts, and contradictions. Moreover, we argue for the necessity of incorporating the ontological dimension into collective planning frameworks. Such an approach, we suggest, holds the potential to open up other ways of inhabiting and conceptualizing territory—ones not epistemologically subordinated to hegemonic development paradigms and capable of accommodating diverse logics of (dis)order and coexistence.
Amid the ongoing expansion of the extractivist offensive over territories, new and renewed forms of spatial organization are emerging in the service of value production. This phenomenon calls for a critical examination of the territorial ordering processes that accompany and enable such transformations. On one hand, these processes are grounded in the epistemological and ontological assumptions that underpin modernity/coloniality. On the other, they are characterized by the deployment of a novel repertoire of expropriatory mechanisms in territories historically deemed peripheral. In this context, we interrogate the role played by territorial planning in reinforcing—or challenging—these dynamics. Taking the Territorial Planning Project of the Province of La Rioja as a point of departure, we ask: To what extent is it possible for multiple worldviews to engage in meaningful dialogue within planning processes that are deeply embedded in the epistemology of development? From this inquiry, and through the analysis developed, we underline the importance of recovering critical perspectives on territory—as a space shaped by tensions, conflicts, and contradictions. Moreover, we argue for the necessity of incorporating the ontological dimension into collective planning frameworks. Such an approach, we suggest, holds the potential to open up other ways of inhabiting and conceptualizing territory—ones not epistemologically subordinated to hegemonic development paradigms and capable of accommodating diverse logics of (dis)order and coexistence.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
