Cuartetero de corazón: La construcción de una identidad cuartetera en las canciones de Carlos «La Mona» Jiménez (1984–1990)

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2023
Editorial
Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Superior de Música
Revista
Revista del Instituto Superior de Música
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1666-7603
eISSN
2362-3322
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En esta comunicación abordaré uno de los cambios más significativos que introdujo Carlos Jiménez Rufino en el cuarteto cordobés durante la década de 1980. Me refiero a la incorporación del tópico identitario. Se trata de un tópico que era extraño tanto para el paradigma tradicional como para el paradigma blanqueado. Analizaré las opciones (líricas y musicales) que le permitieron construirlo, e integrarlo a un dispositivo de enunciación particular.Para esta comunicación se seleccionaron las 14 pistas que participan directamente en la construcción de una narrativa identitaria. Es decir, canciones en las que el enunciador se autoadscribe a un colectivo, a un nosotros, y canciones que complementan la descripción de las características de ese colectivo y de sus miembros. Se las analizó sincrónicamente, buscando las recurrencias y diferencias, y diacrónicamente, poniéndolas en relación con las disputas que en cada momento se estaban dando dentro del campo del cuarteto cordobés, y dentro de la sociedad cordobesa.La tesis que guía esta comunicación es que la etiqueta cuartetero, que utilizó Jiménez para edificar su propio discurso identitario, existía previamente como discurso alteritario. Es decir, lo que hizo Jiménez fue apropiarse y resignificar esa etiqueta en un diálogo permanente con ese discurso alteritario que estigmatizaba al cuarteto, a sus productores y público. De esa manera, adoptando la identidad cuartetera como valor contribuyó a sobremarcar, en términos de clase social, al cuarteto cordobés.
In this communication I will address one of the most significant changes that Carlos Jiménez Rufino introduced in the Cordoba quartet during the 1980s. I refer to the incorporation of the topic of identity. This is a topic that had been forgotten by both, the traditional paradigm and the «whitewashed» paradigm. I will analyze the options (lyrical and musical) that allowed him to build it, and integrate it into a particular enunciation device. For this communication, we have selected 14 tracks that directly participate in the construction of an identity narrative. That is to say, songs in which the enunciator assigns himself to a collective, us, and songs that complement the description of the characteristics of that collective and its members. They were analyzed synchronously in order to find recurrences and differences, and diachronically to relate them to the disputes that were taking place on each moment along the field of the Cordovan quartet, and also along the Cordovan society. The thesis that guides this communication is that the quarteterean label, which Jiménez used to build his own identity discourse, had a previous existence as an alteritarian discourse. In other words, what Jiménez did was to appropriate and resignify that label within a permanent dialogue with that alteritarian discourse, which stigmatized the quartet, its producers, and the public. Thus, adopting the quarteterean identity as a value contributed to overmark, in terms of social class, the Cordovan quartet.
In this communication I will address one of the most significant changes that Carlos Jiménez Rufino introduced in the Cordoba quartet during the 1980s. I refer to the incorporation of the topic of identity. This is a topic that had been forgotten by both, the traditional paradigm and the «whitewashed» paradigm. I will analyze the options (lyrical and musical) that allowed him to build it, and integrate it into a particular enunciation device. For this communication, we have selected 14 tracks that directly participate in the construction of an identity narrative. That is to say, songs in which the enunciator assigns himself to a collective, us, and songs that complement the description of the characteristics of that collective and its members. They were analyzed synchronously in order to find recurrences and differences, and diachronically to relate them to the disputes that were taking place on each moment along the field of the Cordovan quartet, and also along the Cordovan society. The thesis that guides this communication is that the quarteterean label, which Jiménez used to build his own identity discourse, had a previous existence as an alteritarian discourse. In other words, what Jiménez did was to appropriate and resignify that label within a permanent dialogue with that alteritarian discourse, which stigmatized the quartet, its producers, and the public. Thus, adopting the quarteterean identity as a value contributed to overmark, in terms of social class, the Cordovan quartet.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
