El texto no se discute, se interpreta". Dos modelos hermenéuticos: Platón y Filón de Alejandría

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2017
Editorial
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista
Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1988-2564
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Un estudio inter-textual detecta que Filón ha hecho un considerable uso de ese diálogo, asumiendo de él específicamente el motivo de la inspiración. Al atender a tales textos se descubre, además, que ese tópico ha sido introducido por ambos pensadores en el marco de sus respectivas reflexiones hermenéuticas. En la filoniana, la dignidad del libro inspirado lleva a priorizar ?lo que el texto dice?, de manera que ?el texto no se discute, se interpreta?. Platón, por su parte, considera que la hermenéutica no puede detenerse ante la canonización de un libro, sino que ha de incorporar previamente el conocimiento del correlato externo al que un texto se refiere. Este trabajo defiende que, contra lo que inicialmente podría parecer, estos modelos no presentan una disrupción sustancial.
This paper examines Philo of Alexandria's reasons to assume one of the topics employed by Plato, i.e. the 'divine inspiration' motif. To explore this motif the Platonic earlier dialogue Ion is a key place. There, the divine inspiration originates a specific mode of interpre-tation. An inter-textual study detected previously that Philo considerably used this Platonic dialogue, specifically drawing the 'inspiration' motif. In attending to those texts it is discovered that both Philo and Plato introduced this topic whithin the framework of their respective thinking on Hermeneutics. The Platonic and Philonian similar use of the 'divine inspiration' topic prompts to reflect on the continuity and disruption between both hermeneutical models. According to Philo, the inspired book has a particular dignity and, then, prioritizes 'what the text says', so that 'the text should not be discussed, it should be rather interpreted'. According to Plato, the interpretation should not stop at a canonized book, but should involve the knowledge of extra-linguistic object. This paper tries to show that, against what it might seem, Platonic and Philonian hermeneutical models do no present substantial disruptions.
This paper examines Philo of Alexandria's reasons to assume one of the topics employed by Plato, i.e. the 'divine inspiration' motif. To explore this motif the Platonic earlier dialogue Ion is a key place. There, the divine inspiration originates a specific mode of interpre-tation. An inter-textual study detected previously that Philo considerably used this Platonic dialogue, specifically drawing the 'inspiration' motif. In attending to those texts it is discovered that both Philo and Plato introduced this topic whithin the framework of their respective thinking on Hermeneutics. The Platonic and Philonian similar use of the 'divine inspiration' topic prompts to reflect on the continuity and disruption between both hermeneutical models. According to Philo, the inspired book has a particular dignity and, then, prioritizes 'what the text says', so that 'the text should not be discussed, it should be rather interpreted'. According to Plato, the interpretation should not stop at a canonized book, but should involve the knowledge of extra-linguistic object. This paper tries to show that, against what it might seem, Platonic and Philonian hermeneutical models do no present substantial disruptions.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
