Circularidad y circulación: notas para una ontología estética

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2010
Editorial
Universidad de Tarapacá
Revista
Límite
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0718-1361
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En el artículo se pretende problematizar la noción de “experiencia estética”, pensándola desde las condiciones actuales de su producción. Mediante un recorrido teórico y analítico de algunos presupuestos de la tradición filosófica moderna se cuestiona la idea de autorreferencialidad en el arte y el principio de Representación como modelo ordenador de la práctica artística. De este modo, se intenta repensar una ontología estética que dé cuenta, verdaderamente, de las condiciones de producción de la obra artística y que comprenda a la obra, y al arte mismo, como "acto", y, precisamente, como "acontecimiento"; pero ello no significa remitir necesariamente a los postulados propios de la “estética de la emergencia” o de la “estética relacional”, sino reestablecer una dimensión en la que el arte vuelve a recuperar un campo de intervención crítica y de acción.
In this article it’s problematized the notion of “aesthetic experience”, thinking it from the current conditions of its production. By means of a critical theoretical and analytic approach to some assumptions of the modern philosophical tradition, the “selfreference” idea in the art is questioned as well as the principle of representation, understood as the principle that organizes the artistic practice. Thus, it is possible a reconsideration of an aesthetic ontology that can explain, in the first place, the building process of the work of art; and second, that understands the work, and the art itself, as act, and in consequence, as event but this does not mean to remit, necessarily, to the postulates of the “aesthetics of emergency” or the “relational aesthetic,” but, on the contrary, looks for the reestablishing of a dimension of art in which this recovers a field of critical intervention and action.
In this article it’s problematized the notion of “aesthetic experience”, thinking it from the current conditions of its production. By means of a critical theoretical and analytic approach to some assumptions of the modern philosophical tradition, the “selfreference” idea in the art is questioned as well as the principle of representation, understood as the principle that organizes the artistic practice. Thus, it is possible a reconsideration of an aesthetic ontology that can explain, in the first place, the building process of the work of art; and second, that understands the work, and the art itself, as act, and in consequence, as event but this does not mean to remit, necessarily, to the postulates of the “aesthetics of emergency” or the “relational aesthetic,” but, on the contrary, looks for the reestablishing of a dimension of art in which this recovers a field of critical intervention and action.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
