Raymond Aron: la democracia y su otro

Otros responsables
Fecha
07/2019
Editorial
Universidad de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
Revista
Cuestiones de Sociología
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2346-8904
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El presente trabajo analiza la forma en la cual Raymond Aron pensó la política en algunos de sus textos más representativos, a saber: Introducción a la filosofía política [1952] y Democracia y totalitarismo [1965]. Para ello, se hace especial hincapié en la relación entre democracia liberal y sus paradigmas adversos. Se pondrá de manifiesto cómo a pesar de ciertas modulaciones, a través de la querella con determinados autores “maquiavelistas” –Michels, Mosca y Pareto–, Aron moviliza una serie de elementos que caracterizan a su decir político, mostrando aristas ligadas a sus tributos teóricos y a las causas políticas sobre las que se pronunció, entre las cuales figuran su ponderación del liberalismo anglosajón y su aversión a la tradición popular francesa.
is paper analyzes the way in which Raymond Aron thought politics in some of his most representative texts, namely: Introduction to political philosophy [1952] and Democracy and totalitarianism [1965]. For this, special emphasis is placed on the relationship between liberal democracy and its adverse paradigms. It will be revealed how, despite some changes, through the debate with certain "Machiavellian" authors -Michels, Mosca and Pareto- Aron restores a series of elements that characterize his political thought, showing his theoretical influences and the political causes he spoke about, as for example was his weighting of Anglo-Saxon liberalism and his aversion to French popular tradition.
is paper analyzes the way in which Raymond Aron thought politics in some of his most representative texts, namely: Introduction to political philosophy [1952] and Democracy and totalitarianism [1965]. For this, special emphasis is placed on the relationship between liberal democracy and its adverse paradigms. It will be revealed how, despite some changes, through the debate with certain "Machiavellian" authors -Michels, Mosca and Pareto- Aron restores a series of elements that characterize his political thought, showing his theoretical influences and the political causes he spoke about, as for example was his weighting of Anglo-Saxon liberalism and his aversion to French popular tradition.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
