El patrocinio de refugiados: una revisión sistemática descriptiva

Otros responsables
Fecha
04/2021
Editorial
Centro Scalabriniano de Estudos Migratórios
Revista
Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1980-8585
eISSN
2237-9843
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En la última década diecisiete países occidentales han adoptado esquemas de patrocinio como respuesta a la denominada crisis de los refugiados. La revisión y sistematización de cuarenta y tres textos publicados sobre tales iniciativas permite detectar importantes diferencias en el diseño y alcance de las mismas en cada una de las regiones del mundo en que se han implementado (Norteamérica, Oceanía, Europa y América Latina). Se advierte, asimismo, que son más los autores partidarios de este tipo de propuestas que aquellos que lo cuestionan, ya sea éste una vía privatizada de reasentamiento, un mecanismo de reunificación familiar, un canal de admisión humanitaria y/o, simplemente, un proyecto de acompañamiento lego. El análisis permite identificar dos principios diferentes al principio de adicionalidad que caracterizó al modelo original de patrocinio canadiense y ello sugiere que las lecturas economicistas y/o humanitarias estarían eclipsando las interpretaciones políticas y centradas en un enfoque de derechos.
In the last decade seventeen Western countries have adopted “sponsorship schemes” as a response to the so called “refugee crisis”. The review and systematization of forty-three publications on such initiatives allow us to identify important differences in their design and scope in each of the World regions in which they have been implemented (North America, Oceania, Europe and Latin America). Additionally, we observe that there are more authors in favour of this type of strategies that those who question it, regardless of it being a privatized route of resettlement, a family reunification mechanism, a humanitarian admission stream or, simply, an amateur support project. The analysis enables us to recognize two principles different from the principle of additionality that characterizes the original model of refugee sponsorship. This suggests that economistic and humanitarian readings are eclipsing political and human rights-centered interpretations.
In the last decade seventeen Western countries have adopted “sponsorship schemes” as a response to the so called “refugee crisis”. The review and systematization of forty-three publications on such initiatives allow us to identify important differences in their design and scope in each of the World regions in which they have been implemented (North America, Oceania, Europe and Latin America). Additionally, we observe that there are more authors in favour of this type of strategies that those who question it, regardless of it being a privatized route of resettlement, a family reunification mechanism, a humanitarian admission stream or, simply, an amateur support project. The analysis enables us to recognize two principles different from the principle of additionality that characterizes the original model of refugee sponsorship. This suggests that economistic and humanitarian readings are eclipsing political and human rights-centered interpretations.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
