¿Cuándo hay archivo?

Otros responsables
Fecha
08/2020
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes. Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes
Revista
Artilugio
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2408-462X
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
¿Que define al género archivo? La categorización ¿responde exclusivamente a características de formato o puede también pensarse el archivo como una poética no visible de aproximación a ciertas temáticas? ¿Cuáles son esas temáticas abordadas recurrentemente desde perspectivas archivistas? La confección de un corpus de análisis para responder a estas preguntas llevó a preguntarnos qué incidencia tienen los discursos del arte en la categorización de experiencias en determinados formatos. Teóricamente, esto atenta contra las posturas teóricas fenomenológicas: en lugar de preguntar qué es archivo, nos preguntamos cuándo se opta por esta poética. Tal análisis situado busca, en primer lugar, descubrir la injerencia política de las experiencias estéticas que recuperan situaciones particulares para insertarlas en circuitos exhibitivos, y en segundo lugar, qué implica que esos circuitos se vinculen con ciertas temáticas archivándolas.
What defines the archive genre? Does the categorization respond exclusively to formal characteristics or can the archive also be thought of as a non-visible poetic of approach to certain themes? Which are these themes repeatedly addressed from archivist perspectives? Making a corpus of analysis to answer these questions led us to ask what effect art discourses have on the categorization of experiences in certain formats. This attempts against phenomenological theoretical positions: instead of asking what is archive, we ask when this poetic exists. Such situated analysis seeks, first of all, to discover the political interference of aesthetic experiences that recover particular situations in order to insert them into exhibition circuits, and secondly, what implies that these circuits are linked to certain themes by archiving them, in the sense that suggest they are kept out of sight, in a place such as a library or a filing cabinet, until a forced exercise takes them out.
What defines the archive genre? Does the categorization respond exclusively to formal characteristics or can the archive also be thought of as a non-visible poetic of approach to certain themes? Which are these themes repeatedly addressed from archivist perspectives? Making a corpus of analysis to answer these questions led us to ask what effect art discourses have on the categorization of experiences in certain formats. This attempts against phenomenological theoretical positions: instead of asking what is archive, we ask when this poetic exists. Such situated analysis seeks, first of all, to discover the political interference of aesthetic experiences that recover particular situations in order to insert them into exhibition circuits, and secondly, what implies that these circuits are linked to certain themes by archiving them, in the sense that suggest they are kept out of sight, in a place such as a library or a filing cabinet, until a forced exercise takes them out.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
