Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
; Santero, Marilina ; Sanchez, Mario ; Tristao, Ignez ; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio ; Spira, Cintia ; Ismael, Julia ; Cavallo, Ana Soledad ; Gutierrez, Laura ; Mazzaresi, Yanina ; Nadal, Ana Maria ; Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel 
Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2023
Editorial
BMJ Publishing Group
Revista
BMJ Open Quality
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
eISSN
2399-6641
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
