Decisionismo y decisión: Carl Schmitt y el retorno a la sencillez del comienzo

Otros responsables
Fecha
10/2015
Editorial
Grupo Interuniversitario Postdata
Revista
Postdata
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1515-209X
eISSN
1851-9601
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
La reflexión teórica sobre la democracia argentina ha encontrado en el concepto schmittiano de decisionismo un recurso expresivo para dar cuenta de la experiencia política reciente. Sin embargo, esto no ha redundado en la determinación precisa y rigurosa del concepto. Esta comunicación aborda la noción de decisionismo, a efectos de ganar precisión conceptual por vía de la restitución del sentido específico de toda decisión jurídica. Para ello, se recupera el tratamiento de las sentencias judiciales provisto por Carl Schmitt en Ley y juicio (1912), identificando a partir de allí tres características esenciales de la toda decisión: su autonomía respecto de la norma, su orientación ordinativa y su carácter personal. Tras censar las características de la decisión normal, esta comunicación vuelve a Teologìa polìtica (1922) para reflexionar sobre la especificidad de la decisión excepcional. De allí, se colige finalmente una definición del decisionismo schmittiano y se deriva una serie de conclusiones en vistas de la teoría y práctica políticas argentinas.
The theoretical reflection upon Argentine democracy has profited from Carl Schmitt's concept ofdecisionism, which appeared to be auseful means ofreferring to recent political history. This wide use of the term has nonetheless coexisted with a persisting lack of accuracy and purport. This article deals with the concept ofdecisionism, in order to gain conceptual accuracy, by means of the restitution ofthe specific sense ofthe judicial decision. To this effect this article comments on Carl Schmitt's treatment of judicial adjudications, as presented in GesetzundUrteil (1912). Three essential features ofall decision are therewith drawn: its autonomy in relation to the norm, its normalizing orientation, and its personal nature. Once described these features of the normal decision, this article focuses on PolitischeTheologie (1922) in order to reflect upon the specificity of the exceptional decision. Finally a definition of Schmittian decisionism is proposed, and a series of conclusions concerning political theory and practice are drawn.
The theoretical reflection upon Argentine democracy has profited from Carl Schmitt's concept ofdecisionism, which appeared to be auseful means ofreferring to recent political history. This wide use of the term has nonetheless coexisted with a persisting lack of accuracy and purport. This article deals with the concept ofdecisionism, in order to gain conceptual accuracy, by means of the restitution ofthe specific sense ofthe judicial decision. To this effect this article comments on Carl Schmitt's treatment of judicial adjudications, as presented in GesetzundUrteil (1912). Three essential features ofall decision are therewith drawn: its autonomy in relation to the norm, its normalizing orientation, and its personal nature. Once described these features of the normal decision, this article focuses on PolitischeTheologie (1922) in order to reflect upon the specificity of the exceptional decision. Finally a definition of Schmittian decisionism is proposed, and a series of conclusions concerning political theory and practice are drawn.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
