Deuda soberana e instituciones internacionales de arbitraje: Las demandas contra Argentina (2006-2016)

Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2018
Editorial
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Revista
Olafinanciera
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1870-1442
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Con el afán de reinsertar a la República Argentina en los circuitos financieros globales, la administración de Mauricio Macri (2015, en adelante) procuró resolver las controversias con los tenedores de títulos públicos argentinos en situación irregular. En marco de tal estrategia -preanunciada en la campaña electoral e implementada raudamente en los primeros días de gestión-, se inscribieron los acuerdos con los tenedores de títulos públicos de nacionalidad italiana que habían incoado demandas contra el país en el marco del Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Disputas Relativas a Inversiones (CIADI). Estos procesos, iniciados tras el cierre del primer tramo del proceso de reestructuración de 2005, fueron objeto de múltiples cuestionamientos político-académicos, al implicar desafíos no sólo para el país, sino para el ordenamiento financiero internacional entero al alterar los circuitos institucionales para la resolución de disputas en materia de deudas soberanas. El propósito del presente artículo es analizar el curso de las demandas incoadas por los tenedores de títulos públicos en el CIADI, desde su inicio hasta su terminación por arreglo.
Guided by the interest of reinserting Argentine Republic into global financial circuits, the administration of Mauricio Macri (2015, onwards) sought to resolve disputes with the holders of Argentine bonds in an irregular situation. As part of this strategy - preannounced in the election campaign and implemented swiftly in the early days of government- the administration concluded agreements with italian bondholders who had brought claims against the country under the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). These complaints, initiated after the closing of the first stage of the restructuring process in 2005, were subject of multiple-academic political questions since they implied challenges not only for the Argentinean State but for the entire international financial system by altering the institutional circuits for resolution of disputes regarding sovereign debt. The purpose of this article is to analyze the course of the claims filed by holders of public securities in the ICSID, from its inception to its termination by arrangement.
Guided by the interest of reinserting Argentine Republic into global financial circuits, the administration of Mauricio Macri (2015, onwards) sought to resolve disputes with the holders of Argentine bonds in an irregular situation. As part of this strategy - preannounced in the election campaign and implemented swiftly in the early days of government- the administration concluded agreements with italian bondholders who had brought claims against the country under the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). These complaints, initiated after the closing of the first stage of the restructuring process in 2005, were subject of multiple-academic political questions since they implied challenges not only for the Argentinean State but for the entire international financial system by altering the institutional circuits for resolution of disputes regarding sovereign debt. The purpose of this article is to analyze the course of the claims filed by holders of public securities in the ICSID, from its inception to its termination by arrangement.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
