Artículo

Geomorphological evolution of the Chimpa stratovolcano in the back-arc region of the Central Andes

Bustos, Emilce Icon; Arnosio, José Marcelo ; Baez, Walter Ariel Icon; Norini, Gianluca ; Suzaño, Nestor Omar Icon; Viramonte, Jose German Icon

Otros responsables

Fecha

2020-09-01

Editorial

Elsevier Science

Revista

Geomorphology

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

0169-555X

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Resumen

The morphological evolution of a volcano records the main events of its formation, and its complexity is a function of overlapping constructive and destructive phases. Typical morphological evolutionary trends have beenestablished: simple cones grow into larger cones or they widen into sub-cones or massifs. However, there are many exceptions to these general sequences. One exception is represented by Chimpa Volcano, an andesitic stratovolcano located in the Central Puna of the Andes. In order to evaluate the morphological evolution of Chimpa Volcano, its morphology was characterized, analyzed and quantified using a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Chimpa Volcano is morphologically classified as a sub-cone, and three constructive stages of evolution and one destructive event have been recognized. The current morphology is related to the formation of an elongated depression flanked by scarps, named Quebrada Casana generated by a destructive event. Morphology and stratigraphy were linked using a parameter named emplacement balance (E*) which is defined as the volumetricratio between the volcanic products emplaced far away from the vent and those which remain near vent. Chimpa Volcano´s morphological evolution is directly related to the type of volcanic products emitted. The evolution began with the emission of pyroclastic density currents (PDCs), where E* remains high, favoring the development of a plateau (Stage I). Then lava dome emplacement in a central position and its destruction reduced the value of E* and a massif was created (Stage II). Finally E* reached the lowest value when the volcano began toemit lava flows forming a sub-cone (Stage III). The presented methodology to evaluate volcanic products in relation to their morphology can be applied to other volcanic edifices in the central Andes and elsewhere

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa