Comparison of deproteinized bovine bone, bioglass and, synthetic hydroxyapatite in the bone healing of a critical sized bone defect. Preliminary study in rats.
; Gonzales Chaves, Macarena Maria Sol
; Orzuza, Ricardo ; Zeni, Susana Noemi 
Otros responsables
Fecha
2019
Editorial
Fundación Revista Medicina
Revista
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
LXIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Clínica; LI Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Farmacología Experimental ; XXI Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Biología; Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Protozoología; IX Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Nanomedicinas; VI Reunión Científica Regional de la Asociación Argentina de Ciencia y Tecnología de Animales de Laboratorio
Fecha del evento
2019-11-13
Institución organizadora
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Clínica
Sociedad Argentina de Biología
Sociedad Argentina de Protozoología
Asociación Argentina de Nanomedicinas
Asociación Argentina de Ciencia y Tecnología de Animales de Laboratorio
Asociación Argentina de Farmacología Experimental
Sociedad Argentina de Biología
Sociedad Argentina de Protozoología
Asociación Argentina de Nanomedicinas
Asociación Argentina de Ciencia y Tecnología de Animales de Laboratorio
Asociación Argentina de Farmacología Experimental
ISSN
0076-6046
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Reunión
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Bone grafts are important for alveolar bone height and volume preservation necessary for dental implant placement. The development of biomaterials for bone grafting with comparable characteristics and
biological effects than those renowned internationally is necessary. Deproteinized bovine bone putty (BB), bioglass (BG) and, synthetic hydroxyapatite (SH) are frequently indicated as bone grafting materials due to their osteoconductive properties. We compared the bone healing response of BB, BG and SH (Odontit Implant Systems, Argentina) in a critical sized bone defect. We created a bone defect of 4 mm diameter in rat tibiae for implantation with each biomaterial (N=30 rats). Samples were collected at 2 and 4 weeks for histological and histomorphometrical analysis of new bone formation (NBF) and remaining particles of each device (RP). Radiographic analysis was done at T=0 and at 2 and 4 weeks. Results: % of NBF (mean ± SD): 2 weeks: Control group: 6.60±3.71; BB group: 23.23±3.89*; BG group: 18.35±5.23*; SH group: 26.27±9.30*; 4 weeks: Control group: 6.69±2.38; BB group: 24.37±3.66*; BG group: 17.45±6.64*; SH group: 32.25±3.80*. % of RP: 2 weeks: Control group: 0±0; BB group: 5.04±1.39*; BG group: 3.03±2.31*; SH group: 4.46±2.87*; 4 weeks: Control group: 0±0; BB group: 4.45±2.35*; BG group: 2.87±1.14*; SH group: 3.78±1.68* (*p<0.05 versus control group; p= NS between BB, BG and SH groups). Although SH exhibited a trend towards increased NBF we did not find statistical significance among the three biomaterials. Bone healing at the implanted sites, was accompanied by a progressive inflammatory response consistent with the expected histological stages of bone repairing. The 3 biomaterials exhibited an increased in radiopacity at 2 and at 4 weeks vs. control group indicating NBF. All biomaterials were associated with trabecular bone formation. Although further studies need to be done, our results indicate that BB, BG and SH exhibit similar osteoconductive properties. Keywords: Bone healing; biomaterials; critical sized bone defect; bovine bone; bioglass; synthetic hydroxyapatite.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
