Evaluating Pre-Immobilization and Post-Immobilization Bioimprinting Strategies for the Activation of Lipases: A Case Study of LipC12

Abstract

Research background. Although there are many studies of the bioimprinting of lipases, there is no study comparing the strategies of bioimprinting prior to immobilization (pre-immobilization) and bioimprinting after immobilization (post-immobilization). Likewise, there is no study that compares bioimprinting of lipases immobilized from a pure lipase preparation and lipases immobilized from a crude extract. We therefore investigated these strategies, using the metagenomic lipase LipC12. Experimental approach. We immobilized LipC12 covalently on the commercial support Immobead 150P and treated it with various bioimprinting agents, either pre-immobilization or post-immobilization. We also compared immobilization from a pure LipC12 preparation and immobilization from a crude cell-free extract. Results and conclusions. The best improvements in triolein-hydrolyzing-activity in n-hexane, compared to a non-bioimprinted control, were obtained with post-immobilization bioimprinting, using oleic acid dissolved in t-butanol: a 12-fold improvement for immobilization from a pure LipC12 preparation and an almost 14-fold improvement for immobilization from the crude cell-free extract. This bioimprinting agent also gave a 3.5-fold increase in activity for the synthesis of ethyl oleate in n-hexane, this result being obtained for pre-immobilization bioimprinting and immobilization from the cell-free extract. Novelty and scientific contribution. This study is the first to compare pre-immobilization and post-immobilization bioimprinting strategies, as well as bioimprinting of enzymes immobilized from both pure enzyme preparations and crude cell-free extracts. These results encourage further investigation into bioimprinting strategies.