Validación de la escala de rendimiento laboral individual en trabajadores argentinos
; Salessi, Solana Magalí 
Otros responsables
Fecha
01/2016
Editorial
Revista anual del Laboratorio de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa
Revista
Revista Evaluar
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1667-4545
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El objetivo del presente estudio fue validar y analizar las propiedadespsicométricas de la Escala de Rendimiento Laboral Individual de Koopmans etal. (2013). Se ejecutó un estudio piloto con 31 estudiantes de posgrado paraanalizar la equivalencia operacional de la escala. Se elaboró un estudioprincipal a efectos de analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la escalapuesta a punto en el estudio piloto. En esta ocasión se trabajó sobre una nuevamuestra seleccionada en forma no probabilística, la que quedó integrada por434 trabajadores. Sobre los datos recabados se ejecutaron análisis factoriales(exploratorio y confirmatorio). Sendos análisis indicaron una estructuratrifactorial con adecuada consistencia (Rendimiento en la tarea: α = .76Comportamientos contraproducentes: α = .76, y Rendimiento en el contexto: α= .72), confiabilidad compuesta (CR mayores a .70), y validez convergente(AVE mayor a .50). La versión argentina del instrumento quedó conformadapor 13 ítems, demostrando ser una medida confiable y parsimoniosa delrendimiento laboral percibido.
The aim of this study was to validate and analyze psychometric properties of Koopmans et al. (2013) Individual Work Performance Scale. A pilot study with 31 postgraduate students was performed to assay the operational equivalence of the scale. A main study was carried out, in order to analyze the psychometric properties of the scale adapted in the pilot study. This time, the non-probabilistic sample comprised 434 workers. Factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were executed over the data obtained. Both of them indicated a trifactorial structure with adequate internal consistency (task performance: α = .76, counterproductive behaviors: α = .76, and contextual performance: α = .72), composite reliability (CR greater than .70), and convergent validity (AVE greater than .50). Argentinean version of the instrument was conformed by 13 items and proved to be a reliable and parsimonious scale to measure perceived job performance.
The aim of this study was to validate and analyze psychometric properties of Koopmans et al. (2013) Individual Work Performance Scale. A pilot study with 31 postgraduate students was performed to assay the operational equivalence of the scale. A main study was carried out, in order to analyze the psychometric properties of the scale adapted in the pilot study. This time, the non-probabilistic sample comprised 434 workers. Factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were executed over the data obtained. Both of them indicated a trifactorial structure with adequate internal consistency (task performance: α = .76, counterproductive behaviors: α = .76, and contextual performance: α = .72), composite reliability (CR greater than .70), and convergent validity (AVE greater than .50). Argentinean version of the instrument was conformed by 13 items and proved to be a reliable and parsimonious scale to measure perceived job performance.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
