Grandes relatos y teleología, sentido común y democracia

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2017
Editorial
LOM
Revista
Actuel Marx Intervenciones
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0718-0179
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
La crisis de los grandes relatos cuestionó a la teleología como el elemento que habilitaba desenlaces políticos totalitarios. Esta crisis dio lugar a formas de pensar que vinculaban modestia epistemológica y tolerancia democrática. Analizaremos como ejemplo la lectura que el argentino José Nun hizo del problema del sentido común en Gramsci en los años ochenta, y su intento de desarrollar las intuiciones gramscianas por medio de una lectura de Wittgenstein. Señalaremos que estas formas de pensar, contienen, a pesar suyo, formas de totalización y de teleología (la seguridad de un desenlace catastrófico es lo que hace exigibles la modestia epistemológica y política). No sólo señalaremos el carácter imaginario de esta ideología (concebir a la práctica como la praxis de un sujeto) sino que también intentaremos señalar su necesidad social en la actual coyuntura. A partir de estos análisis nos proponemos revisar algunas evidencias corrientes del pensamiento político y social y recuperar algunos conceptos claves de la tradición marxista.
The crisis of the “meta-narratives” pointed to teleology as the element that made possible political totalitarism. This crisis gave place to ways of thought (ideologies) that linked epistemological moderation and democratic tolerance. We will analyze the reading of Gramsci’s approach to common sense by the Argentinean sociologist José Nun during the 80s and his essay of developing Gramsci’s intuition with the help of a reading of second Wittgenstein. We will point that these ways of thought implies, nevertheless, special forms of totalization and teleology (the certainty of a catastrophic outcome of the history justifi es the requirement of epistemological and political moderation). We not only point the imaginary character of this ideology (to understand practice as the praxis of a subject) but we also try to point to its social necessity in the present conjuncture. With these analyses in mind we try to question some common evidences in current social and political though and to recover some key concepts from the Marxist tradition.
The crisis of the “meta-narratives” pointed to teleology as the element that made possible political totalitarism. This crisis gave place to ways of thought (ideologies) that linked epistemological moderation and democratic tolerance. We will analyze the reading of Gramsci’s approach to common sense by the Argentinean sociologist José Nun during the 80s and his essay of developing Gramsci’s intuition with the help of a reading of second Wittgenstein. We will point that these ways of thought implies, nevertheless, special forms of totalization and teleology (the certainty of a catastrophic outcome of the history justifi es the requirement of epistemological and political moderation). We not only point the imaginary character of this ideology (to understand practice as the praxis of a subject) but we also try to point to its social necessity in the present conjuncture. With these analyses in mind we try to question some common evidences in current social and political though and to recover some key concepts from the Marxist tradition.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
