Sexualidades im/productivas: implicancias epistémico-subjetivas de una heterocolonialidad en curso

Otros responsables
Fecha
11/2022
Editorial
Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades desde América Latina
Revista
Pacha
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2697-3677
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Este trabajo se propone ensayar un diálogo entre, por un lado, la propuesta de un dispositivo de mestizaje cuya condición sine qua non es la relación heterosexual entre hombres europeosy mujeres indígenas y, por otro, un dispositivo de sodomía que se despliega en relación con/a través de una heterocolonialidad. No obstante, para abordar estas dimensiones, reconstruiréantes un marco teórico que opera como fuente nutricia para comprender sus mutuas tensiones con el objetivo de seguir problematizando la supuesta “naturaleza” del dimorfismo biológico y de la construcción dicotomía de género tanto en relación con el pasado como con el presente, sobre todo si tenemos en cuenta la actualidad contextual de discursos tales como los dela “ideología de género”. Como resultado, se presenta un panorama ampliado para pensar las relaciones entre sexo-género-sexualidad cuya hipótesis central es que la heterosexualidad (y hoy podríamos pensar cisheterosexualidad) es producto de la conquista.
This work aims to test a dialogue between, on one hand, the proposal of a miscegenation device whose sine qua non condition is the heterosexual relationship between European men and indigenous women and, on the other, a sodomy device that unfolds in relation to/through a heterocoloniality. However, to address these dimensions, I will first reconstruct a theoretical framework that operates as a nourishing source to understand their mutual tensions with the aim of continuing to problematize the supposed “nature” of biological dimorphism and the gender dichotomy construction both in relation to the past and the present, especially if we take into account the current context of discourses such as those of “gender ideology”. As a result, an expanded panorama is presented to think about the relationships between sex-gender-sexuality whose central hypothesis is that heterosexuality (and today we could think of cisheterosexuality) is a product of conquest.
This work aims to test a dialogue between, on one hand, the proposal of a miscegenation device whose sine qua non condition is the heterosexual relationship between European men and indigenous women and, on the other, a sodomy device that unfolds in relation to/through a heterocoloniality. However, to address these dimensions, I will first reconstruct a theoretical framework that operates as a nourishing source to understand their mutual tensions with the aim of continuing to problematize the supposed “nature” of biological dimorphism and the gender dichotomy construction both in relation to the past and the present, especially if we take into account the current context of discourses such as those of “gender ideology”. As a result, an expanded panorama is presented to think about the relationships between sex-gender-sexuality whose central hypothesis is that heterosexuality (and today we could think of cisheterosexuality) is a product of conquest.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
