Artículo

The reconstructed cranium of Pierolapithecus and the evolution of the great ape face

Pugh, Kelsey D. ; Catalano, Santiago Andres Icon; Pérez de los Ríos, Miriam ; Fortuny, Josep ; Shearer, Brian M. ; Vecino Gazabón, Alessandra ; Hammond, Ashley S. ; Moyà Solà, Salvador ; Alba, David M. ; Almécija, Sergio

Otros responsables

Fecha

10/2023

Editorial

National Academy of Sciences

Revista

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

0027-8424

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Resumen

Pierolapithecus catalaunicus (~12 million years ago, northeastern Spain) is key to understanding the mosaic nature of hominid (great ape and human) evolution. Notably, its skeleton indicates that an orthograde (upright) body plan preceded suspensory adaptations in hominid evolution. However, there is ongoing debate about this species, partly because the sole known cranium, preserving a nearly complete face, suffers from taphonomic damage. We 1) carried out a micro computerized tomography (CT) based virtual reconstruction of the Pierolapithecus cranium, 2) assessed its morphological affinities using a series of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) morphometric analyses, and 3) modeled the evolution of key aspects of ape face form. The reconstruction clarifies many aspects of the facial morphology of Pierolapithecus. Our results indicate that it is most similar to great apes (fossil and extant) in overall face shape and size and is morphologically distinct from other Middle Miocene apes. Crown great apes can be distinguished from other taxa in several facial metrics (e.g., low midfacial prognathism, relatively tall faces) and only some of these features are found in Pierolapithecus, which is most consistent with a stem (basal) hominid position. The inferred morphology at all ancestral nodes within the hominoid (ape and human) tree is closer to great apes than to hylobatids (gibbons and siamangs), which are convergent with other smaller anthropoids. Our analyses support a hominid ancestor that was distinct from all extant and fossil hominids in overall facial shape and shared many features with Pierolapithecus. This reconstructed ancestral morphotype represents a testable hypothesis that can be reevaluated as new fossils are discovered.

Colecciones

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd