Biological invasions: A global assessment of geographic distributions, long‐term trends, and data gaps
; Cadotte, Marc W.
; Capinha, César ; Carlton, James T. ; Crouch, Jo Anne ; Daehler, Curtis C. ; Essl, Franz ; Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. ; Fridley, Jason D. ; Fuentes, Nicol ; García Díaz, Pablo
; Schwindt, Evangelina
; Strayer, David L. ; Werenkraut, Victoria 
Otros responsables
Fecha
08/2025
Editorial
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
Revista
Biological Reviews
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1464-7931
eISSN
1469-185X
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
NEOBIOTA , INVASIVE SPECIES , NON-NATIVE , ALIEN , BIOGEOGRAPHY , TIME SERIES , WORLDWIDE , FUTURE PROJECTIONS , KNOWLEDGE GAPS , IPBES
Resumen
Biological invasions are one of the major drivers of biodiversity decline and have been shown to have far-reachingconsequences for society and the economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of alien species represents themost effective solution to reducing their impacts on nature and human well-being. However, implementing effectivesolutions requires a good understanding of where the species are established and how biological invasionsdevelop over time. Knowledge of the status and trends of biological invasions is thus key for guiding researchefforts, informing stakeholders and policymakers, for targeted management efforts, and preparing for the future.However, information about the status and trends of alien species is scattered, patchy, and highly incomplete, makingit difficult to assess. Published reports for individual regions and taxonomic groups are available, but large-scaleoverviews are scarce. A global assessment therefore requires a review of available knowledge with careful considerationof sampling and reporting biases. This paper provides a comprehensive global assessment of the status andtrends of alien species for major taxonomic groups [Bacteria, Protozoa, Stramenopila, Alveolata, and Rhizaria(SAR), fungi, plants, and animals] for Intergovernmental Panel of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)regions.The review provides irrefutable evidence that alien species have been introduced to all regions worldwide includingAntarctica and have spread to even the most remote islands. The numbers of alien species are increasing within alltaxa and across all regions, and are often even accelerating. Large knowledge gaps exist, particularly for taxonomicgroups other than vascular plants and vertebrates, for regions in Africa and Central Asia, and for aquatic realms. Infact, for inconspicuous species, such as Bacteria, Protozoa, and to some degree SAR and fungi, we found records forvery few species and regions. Observed status and trends are thus highly influenced by research effort. More generally,it is likely that all lists for alien species of any taxonomic group and region are incomplete. The reported speciesnumbers therefore represent minima, and we can expect additions to all lists in the near future.We identified six keychallenges which need to be addressed to reduce knowledge gaps and to improve our ability to assess trends and statusof biological invasions.
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
