El conocimiento científico y uso de evidencias en la seguridad del paciente durante la pospandemia por los equipos de salud de hospitales de Corrientes, Argentina.Período 2022-2023
; Gómez, Fernando ; Medina, Oscar ; Sanchez, Lucia Ines ; Gómez, Carolina ; Avalos, Daisi ; Rodriguez, Leonardo Otros responsables
Fecha
03/2025
Editorial
Universidad Privada María Serrana
Revista
Revista de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
2521-9596
eISSN
2617-2852
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Introducción: La relación entre evidencia científica y prácticas sanitarias permite implementar políticas en seguridad del paciente. Objetivo general: Describir acceso, difusión y uso de conocimientos científicos sobre seguridad del paciente en pospandemia por equipos de salud de hospitales de Corrientes capital. Método: Cuantitativo, descriptivo, transversal. Población: personal sanitario que aceptó participar. Recolección de datos mediante instrumento validado. Variables: tipos y usos del conocimiento sobre seguridad del paciente; principales barreras en su obtención; necesidades de capacitación. Resultados: Se entrevistaron 43 personas. Sobre conocimientos teóricos en seguridad del paciente 69,77% reportó suficientes; en conocimientos prácticos 65,12%indicó que provenían de su experiencia laboral; en habilidades técnico-instrumentales55,81% percibió tenerlas; en psicosociales 69,77% indicó suficientes; 59% manifestó obtener saberes del contacto con pacientes; 20% refirió escasos saberes prácticos; mínimas habilidades técnico-instrumentales y pocos experienciales del intercambio con enfermos. Sobre uso del conocimiento para atención o tratamiento 70% informó utilizarlos extensamente; 65,12%, destacó adherencia a estándares y regulaciones; 51%destacó la investigación para profundizar saberes en seguridad del paciente; 18,84%obtuvo información relevante en capacitaciones de redes profesionales. Sólo 11,59%mencionó las universidades como fuente de información útil en seguridad del paciente. Como barreras para los conocimientos 26,32% consideró la seguridad del paciente una disciplina compleja; 21,05% reconoció escasez y naturaleza preliminar de la información científica; 29,82% ubicó al trabajo institucional no alineado con la seguridad del paciente;22,81% mencionó a la comunicación como poco efectiva. Conclusiones: Los equipos sanitarios refieren suficientes conocimientos y habilidades en seguridad del paciente para mejorar atención y minimizar riesgos. Principales barreras las organizativas.
Introduction: The relationship between scientific evidence and health practices allows the implementation of policies on patient safety. General objective: To describe access, dissemination and use of scientific knowledge on patient safety in the post-pandemic by health teams in hospitals in the capital of Corrientes. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional. Population: health personnel who agreed to participate. Data collection using a validated instrument. Variables: types and uses of knowledge on patient safety; main barriers to obtaining it; training needs. Results: 43 people were interviewed. Regarding theoretical knowledge on patient safety, 69.77% reported that it was sufficient; regarding practical knowledge, 65.12% indicated that it came from their work experience; regarding technical-instrumental skills, 55.81% perceived that they had them; regarding psychosocial skills, 69.77% indicated that it was sufficient; 59% stated that they obtained knowledge from contact with patients; 20% reported little practical knowledge; minimal technical-instrumental skills and little experience from the exchange with patients. Regarding the use of knowledge for care or treatment, 70% reported using it extensively; 65.12% highlighted adherence to standards and regulations; 51% highlighted research to deepen knowledge on patient safety; 18.84% obtained relevant information in training from professional networks. Only 11.59% mentioned universities as a source of useful information on patient safety. As barriers to knowledge, 26.32% considered patient safety a complex discipline; 21.05% recognized the scarcity and preliminary nature of scientific information; 29.82% placed institutional work not aligned with patient safety; 22.81% mentioned communication as ineffective. Conclusions: Health teams report sufficient knowledge and skills in patient safety to improve care and minimize risks. Main barriers are organizational.
Introduction: The relationship between scientific evidence and health practices allows the implementation of policies on patient safety. General objective: To describe access, dissemination and use of scientific knowledge on patient safety in the post-pandemic by health teams in hospitals in the capital of Corrientes. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional. Population: health personnel who agreed to participate. Data collection using a validated instrument. Variables: types and uses of knowledge on patient safety; main barriers to obtaining it; training needs. Results: 43 people were interviewed. Regarding theoretical knowledge on patient safety, 69.77% reported that it was sufficient; regarding practical knowledge, 65.12% indicated that it came from their work experience; regarding technical-instrumental skills, 55.81% perceived that they had them; regarding psychosocial skills, 69.77% indicated that it was sufficient; 59% stated that they obtained knowledge from contact with patients; 20% reported little practical knowledge; minimal technical-instrumental skills and little experience from the exchange with patients. Regarding the use of knowledge for care or treatment, 70% reported using it extensively; 65.12% highlighted adherence to standards and regulations; 51% highlighted research to deepen knowledge on patient safety; 18.84% obtained relevant information in training from professional networks. Only 11.59% mentioned universities as a source of useful information on patient safety. As barriers to knowledge, 26.32% considered patient safety a complex discipline; 21.05% recognized the scarcity and preliminary nature of scientific information; 29.82% placed institutional work not aligned with patient safety; 22.81% mentioned communication as ineffective. Conclusions: Health teams report sufficient knowledge and skills in patient safety to improve care and minimize risks. Main barriers are organizational.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
