Más allá de las morales: controversia, lucha, grietas: El subcampo de los estudios literarios y la universidad argentina (1958-2015)

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2020
Editorial
Universidad de ConcepcióN
Revista
Atenea
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0718-0462
eISSN
0716-1840
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Este artículo se desprende del proyecto International Cooperation in the Social-Sciences and Humanities: Comparative Socio-Historical Perspectives and Future Possibilities, dirigido por Gisèle Sapiro. Dicha investigación buscó delinear una “morfología comparativa” que diera cuenta de la organización de las ciencias sociales y humanas en siete disciplinas (Sociología, Psicología, Filosofía, Economía, Literatura, Antropología y Ciencias Políticas) en nueve países (Argentina, Brasil, Francia, Italia, Reino Unido, Austria, Países Bajos, Hungría y Estados Unidos). En ese marco analicé los procesos de institucionalización e internacionalización de los estudios literarios en Argentina entre 1958 y 2015. Esta presentación se basa en la síntesis de esa investigación: examina el lugar que la universidad ha ocupado en un subcampo atravesado por la fl uctuación entre dictaduras y restituciones de la democracia, crisis económicas y diferentes políticas de fi nanciamiento de la educación, la ciencia y la tecnología. La primera sección precisa, sintéticamente, las decisiones metodológicas tomadas. Luego se resumen los resultados. Finalmente, se concluye con refl exiones sobre el lugar de la universidad en la dinámica del subcampo de los estudios literarios en Argentina.
Th is article originates from the project International Cooperation in the Social-Sciences and Humanities: Comparative Socio-Historical Perspectives and Future Possibilities directed by Gisèle Sapiro. Such project aimed at delineating a “comparative morphology” which accounted for the institutional organization and internationalization of Humanities and Social Sciences in seven disciplines (Sociology, Psychology, Philosophy, Economics, Literature, Anthropology, and Political Science) and in nine countries (Argentina, Brazil, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Austria, the Netherlands, Hungary and the United States). Within that project I analyzed the processes of institutionalization and internationalization of literary studies in Argentina between 1958 and 2015. What follows is based on a synthesis of that study. This article examines the place the university has had in a subfield affected by fluctuation between dictatorships and restorations of democracy, economic crises and different public policies regarding the funding of education, science and technology. The first section briefly pinpoints the methodological decisions made in this study, followed by a brief reconstruction of the results. This paper concludes with reflections on the university and the dynamics of the subfield of Literary Studies in Argentina.
Th is article originates from the project International Cooperation in the Social-Sciences and Humanities: Comparative Socio-Historical Perspectives and Future Possibilities directed by Gisèle Sapiro. Such project aimed at delineating a “comparative morphology” which accounted for the institutional organization and internationalization of Humanities and Social Sciences in seven disciplines (Sociology, Psychology, Philosophy, Economics, Literature, Anthropology, and Political Science) and in nine countries (Argentina, Brazil, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Austria, the Netherlands, Hungary and the United States). Within that project I analyzed the processes of institutionalization and internationalization of literary studies in Argentina between 1958 and 2015. What follows is based on a synthesis of that study. This article examines the place the university has had in a subfield affected by fluctuation between dictatorships and restorations of democracy, economic crises and different public policies regarding the funding of education, science and technology. The first section briefly pinpoints the methodological decisions made in this study, followed by a brief reconstruction of the results. This paper concludes with reflections on the university and the dynamics of the subfield of Literary Studies in Argentina.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
