Compromiso para investigar, memorias para producir: Sobre el encuentro entre la etnografía y la gestión de políticas públicas

Otros responsables
Fecha
2020
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
Revista
Título del libro
Perspectivas Etnográficas Contemporáneas en Argentina
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
eISSN
ISBN
978-950-774-371-9
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Este texto es un ejercicio reflexivo sobre las posibilidades que la etnografía nos genera como herramienta reflexiva. Ya que en principio no hay ninguna imposibilidad para el antropólogo de intentar hacer un análisis de su alteridad mínima. Contamos con una caja de herramientas y una serie de reglas metodológicas aprendidas pacientemente, que nos permiten distanciarnos y poder interpretar el mundo que nos rodea críticamente. Sin embargo, estas reglas son más fáciles de enunciar que de poner en práctica y llevarlas adelante, hacia algún (buen) puerto. ¿Cómo desacralizar un espacio en el cual trabajé, compartí discusiones, accioné actividades, determiné que se incluía y que se excluía en las definiciones sobre la memoria? ¿Cómo tomar distancia, en y para la escritura de ejercicios constantes de reflexividad sobre la arbitrariedad de los mecanismos de la memoria en el espacio público? No es una tarea fácil, aunque, sin duda fascinante.
This text is a reflective exercise on the possibilities that ethnography generates for us as a reflective tool. Since in principle there is no impossibility for the anthropologist to try to make an analysis of its minimal alterity. We have a toolbox and a series of methodological rules patiently learned, which allow us to distance ourselves and be able to interpret the world that surrounds us critically. However, these rules are easier to enunciate than to put into practice and carry them forward, towards some (good) port: how to deconsecrate a space in which I worked, shared discussions, acted on activities, determined that it was included and that it was excluded in the definitions on memory? How to take distance, in and for the writing of constant exercises of reflexivity on the arbitrariness of the mechanisms of memory in public space? It is not an easy task, although it is undoubtedly fascinating.
This text is a reflective exercise on the possibilities that ethnography generates for us as a reflective tool. Since in principle there is no impossibility for the anthropologist to try to make an analysis of its minimal alterity. We have a toolbox and a series of methodological rules patiently learned, which allow us to distance ourselves and be able to interpret the world that surrounds us critically. However, these rules are easier to enunciate than to put into practice and carry them forward, towards some (good) port: how to deconsecrate a space in which I worked, shared discussions, acted on activities, determined that it was included and that it was excluded in the definitions on memory? How to take distance, in and for the writing of constant exercises of reflexivity on the arbitrariness of the mechanisms of memory in public space? It is not an easy task, although it is undoubtedly fascinating.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
