Artículo

The Shadow of Kantian Schematism behind Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Art

Belgrano, Mateo Icon

Otros responsables

Fecha

05/2025

Editorial

Romanian Society for Phenomenology

Revista

Studia Phaenomenologica

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

1582-5647

eISSN

2069-0061

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Resumen

During the winter semester of 1925/26, in his seminar on logic, Martin Heidegger suggested that artistic representation can be seen as a form of schematization—an extension of Kant’s original concept of the schema. What should we make of this passing mention of art in the 1925/26 seminar? How does it relate to “The Origin of the Work of Art”? Did schematism motivate Heidegger to reflect on art? I propose that the notion of the schema is crucial for understanding the role of art in Heidegger’s philosophy. My argument is that, having emphasized the ontological difference for so long, Heidegger requires a mediator to bridge the gap between the ontological and the ontic dimen­sions—for the former to function as a condition of possibility for the latter. In this context, the work of art serves as such a mediator, akin to the Kantian schema, bringing together two heterogeneous elements.

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa