Democracia y pluralismo en el ocaso de la soberanía

Otros responsables
Fecha
01/2014
Editorial
Universidad de Sevilla
Revista
Araucaria
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1575-6823
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El artículo se ocupa de las perspectivas problemáticas acerca de la democracia contemporánea que ha venido avanzando Carlo Galli en una serie de obras breves en los últimos cinco años. Haremos una exposición sistemática de sus enfoques, centrándonos en la relación entre Estado, democracia y derechos. Nos interesa señalar que el realismo que caracteriza al pensamiento de Carl Schmitt y sobre el cual Galli construye su narrativa histórica sobre la democracia, lo conduce a una relación problemática con el pluralismo. El Estado moderno encuentra su punto arquimédico en su supresión, en la medida en que la soberanía vuelve homogéneo al espacio político; en la edad global, en cambio, la dislocación del espacio político moderno exacerba el pluralismo, suprimiendo las antiguas fronteras entre el interior y el exterior. Sin embargo, en ambos enfoques el pluralismo sólo es considerado en forma externa a la noción de democracia, sin llegar a ser problematizado, ya que la cuestión que ocupa a Galli es la de lo político y su ocaso en el pluralismo radicalizado del mundo actual.
The article deals with the problematic perspectives of contemporary democracy diagnosed by Carlo Galli in a series of short works in the last Fve years. I will make a systematic exposition of his approach, focusing on the relationship between State, democracy and rights. Galli builds his historical narrative about democracy leaning on the ideas of Carl Schmitt. I want to point out that political realism characteristic of Schmitt’s thought leads to a problematic relationship with pluralism. The modern State has its Archimedean point in the removal of pluralism, and the political space becomes homogeneous through the work of sovereignty. In the global age, however, the dislocation of modern political spaces exacerbates pluralism, deleting the old boundaries between the inside and the outside. However, in both approaches pluralism is only considered external to the notion of democracy, without being problematized, as the issue at hand to Galli is “the political” and its wane in the radical pluralism of the present world.
The article deals with the problematic perspectives of contemporary democracy diagnosed by Carlo Galli in a series of short works in the last Fve years. I will make a systematic exposition of his approach, focusing on the relationship between State, democracy and rights. Galli builds his historical narrative about democracy leaning on the ideas of Carl Schmitt. I want to point out that political realism characteristic of Schmitt’s thought leads to a problematic relationship with pluralism. The modern State has its Archimedean point in the removal of pluralism, and the political space becomes homogeneous through the work of sovereignty. In the global age, however, the dislocation of modern political spaces exacerbates pluralism, deleting the old boundaries between the inside and the outside. However, in both approaches pluralism is only considered external to the notion of democracy, without being problematized, as the issue at hand to Galli is “the political” and its wane in the radical pluralism of the present world.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
