Artículo

Discrete and morphometric traits reveal contrasting patterns and processes in the macroevolutionary history of a clade of scorpions

Mongiardino Koch, Nicolás Icon; Ceccarelli, Fadia Sara Icon; Ojanguren Affilastro, Andres Alejandro Icon; Ramirez, Martin Javier Icon

Otros responsables

Fecha

04/2017

Editorial

Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc

Revista

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

1010-061X

eISSN

1420-9101

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Resumen

Many palaeontological studies have investigated the evolution of entire body plans, generally relying on discrete character-taxon matrices. In contrast, macroevolutionary studies performed by neontologists have mostly focused on morphometric traits. Although these data types are very different, some studies have suggested that they capture common patterns. Nonetheless, the tests employed to support this claim have not explicitly incorporated a phylogenetic framework and may therefore be susceptible to confounding effects due to the presence of common phylogenetic structure. We address this question using the scorpion genus Brachistosternus Pocock 1893 as case study. We make use of a time-calibrated multilocus molecular phylogeny, and compile discrete and traditional morphometric data sets, both capturing the overall morphology of the organisms. We find that morphospaces derived from these matrices are significantly different, and that the degree of discordance cannot be replicated by simulations of random character evolution. Moreover, we find strong support for contrasting modes of evolution, with discrete characters being congruent with an ‘early burst’ scenario whereas morphometric traits suggest species-specific adaptations to have driven morphological evolution. The inferred macroevolutionary dynamics are therefore contingent on the choice of character type. Finally, we confirm that metrics of correlation fail to detect these profound differences given common phylogenetic structure in both data sets, and that methods incorporating a phylogenetic framework and accounting for expected covariance should be favoured.

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa