La contingencia moral y política de la sociedad: Un análisis sistémico de la legislación de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo

Otros responsables
Fecha
04/2020
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales
Revista
Temas y Debates
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1666-0714
eISSN
1853-984X
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
No podemos pensar lo político como un sistema cerrado sobre sí mismo, capaz de generar las respuestas definitivas y vinculantes a las manifestaciones populares y demandas que no cesan de interpelar a nuestras democracias. La construcción democrática pareciera, así, ser una fórmula de contingencia de un sistema político que nunca termina de sobrecerrarse, de serel equivalente exacto de la democracia; probablemente porque la democracia misma sea la llave que una y otra vez lo reabre. Teniendo como referencia ese marco teórico, nuestra aspiración es la de poder repensar un fenómeno que nos interpela como sociedad, y sobre el cual buscamos promover ciertas aristas interpretativas desde la Teoría de los Sistemas Sociales de Niklas Luhmann (que creemos, puede colaborar en esto). Desde esta inquietud, intuimos que la negación de la legalización del aborto como comunicación propia del sistema político (lo mismo hubiera sido su aceptación) es un buen ejemplo para pensar la articulación de tres elementos fundamentales que marcan, por momentos, el pulso de nuestra sociedad en conflicto: el sistema moral de la sociedad, las manifestaciones de protesta, y el sistema político de la sociedad.
One cannot think of politics as a closed system on itself, able to give definitive and binding answers to popular demonstrations and demands, which constantly question our democracies. The democratic construction thus seems to be a contingency’s formula of the political system that never gets to be over-closed; as far as being considered the exact equivalent of democracy. Probably, the democracy could be the key that reopens the political system once and again. Taking this theoretical framework as a reference, our aim is to be able to understand a phenomenon that challenges us as a society and as a systems’ theory interpreter on society (based on Niklas Luhman thoughts). From this concern, one can infer that the denial of the legalization of abortion as political system’s communication (the same would be its acceptance) is a good example to think about articulation of three fundamental elements in contemporary conflict society: moral system of society, protest demonstration and political system of society.
One cannot think of politics as a closed system on itself, able to give definitive and binding answers to popular demonstrations and demands, which constantly question our democracies. The democratic construction thus seems to be a contingency’s formula of the political system that never gets to be over-closed; as far as being considered the exact equivalent of democracy. Probably, the democracy could be the key that reopens the political system once and again. Taking this theoretical framework as a reference, our aim is to be able to understand a phenomenon that challenges us as a society and as a systems’ theory interpreter on society (based on Niklas Luhman thoughts). From this concern, one can infer that the denial of the legalization of abortion as political system’s communication (the same would be its acceptance) is a good example to think about articulation of three fundamental elements in contemporary conflict society: moral system of society, protest demonstration and political system of society.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
