Máscaras falsas, identidades verdaderas: Breves reflexiones sobre disidencia y alteridad

Otros responsables
Fecha
07/2022
Editorial
Eudeba
Revista
Revista Argentina de Ciencia Política
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0329-3092
eISSN
2683-9032
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
El presente artículo explora el término disidencia desde el marco analítico de la sociología de las identidades políticas. Tras auscultar brevemente las formas en que ha sido estudiada la temática de manera reciente, tanto desde la ciencia política como desde la historiografía, proponemos definir a la disidencia como un proceso por el cual una parte de una organización política, al confrontar y tensionar con su dirigencia, jefes destacados o miembros tradicionales, se escinde, al tiempo que se autoproclama como la auténtica y verdadera representante de la organización de origen. De tal manera, los disidentes considerarán a sus antiguos dirigentes y compañeros como traidores y usurpadores ilegítimos de una verdadera tradición. En estos términos, se exploran algunos ejemplos que contribuyen al estudio de las disidencias en América Latina, especialmente en Colombia. Con esta indagación preliminar se busca finalmente destacar la potencialidad analítica de las disidencias para el estudio de procesos sociopolíticos contemporáneos.
This article explores the term Dissidence from the analytical framework of the Sociology of Political Identities. After briefly examining the ways in which the topic has been studied recently, both from political science and historiography, it is proposed to define Dissidence as a process by which a part of a political organization, when confronting and stressing with its leadership, prominent chiefs or traditional members, splits from the latter and proclaiming itself as the authentic and true representative of the organization of origin. Consequently, the dissidents will regard their former leaders and comrades as traitors and illegitimate usurpers of an authentic and true tradition. From this perspective, some examples are explored that contribute to the study of dissidences in Latin America, especially in Colombia. With this preliminary inquiry, I finally seek to highlight the analytical potential of dissidences in order to study contemporary socio-political experiences.
This article explores the term Dissidence from the analytical framework of the Sociology of Political Identities. After briefly examining the ways in which the topic has been studied recently, both from political science and historiography, it is proposed to define Dissidence as a process by which a part of a political organization, when confronting and stressing with its leadership, prominent chiefs or traditional members, splits from the latter and proclaiming itself as the authentic and true representative of the organization of origin. Consequently, the dissidents will regard their former leaders and comrades as traitors and illegitimate usurpers of an authentic and true tradition. From this perspective, some examples are explored that contribute to the study of dissidences in Latin America, especially in Colombia. With this preliminary inquiry, I finally seek to highlight the analytical potential of dissidences in order to study contemporary socio-political experiences.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
