Virtudes de la doctrina y errores de la política: Monseñor Gustavo Franceschi ante los "totalitarismos" soviético, fascista y nacionalsocialista

Otros responsables
Fecha
04/2017
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Estudios Socio-Históricos
Revista
Quinto Sol
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0329-2665
eISSN
1851-2879
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En el uso del concepto totalitarismo se compendian una buena parte de
los debates ideológicos y los posicionamientos políticos del siglo XX.
Ese uso, y muchas veces abuso, quedó, por lo tanto, enredado en un
empleo instrumental, en un juego comparativo mezquino entre sus diferentes
expresiones y en una lectura que olvidaba o resaltaba matices de
acuerdo con el lugar que ocupara y los intereses que defendiera quien lo
usaba. Como señala Enzo Traverso, pocos términos de la cultura política
moderna son tan ambiguos, maleables y polimorfos como el vocablo
totalitarismo.
Totalitarismo es una palabra que forma parte del léxico de todas las corrientes
políticas e ideológicas, pero en este artículo nos aproximaremos
al uso que le dio un sector de las derechas argentinas contemporáneas,
más específicamente la derecha católica de inclinación corporativista y,
dentro de ella, se atiende a la perspectiva que construyó (en artículos escritos
desde 1919, recopilados como libros en los primeros años cuarenta)
monseñor Gustavo Franceschi, reconocido intelectual del catolicismo
social argentino.
A great deal of ideological debates and political positions of XX century were associated to the use of the concept of totalitarianism. This usage, often abuse, developed an instrumental significance which was entangled in a petty comparative game between its different interpretations, along with a perception that diminished, or highlighted, nuances depending upon the interests or social status of who was using it. As stated by Enzo Traverso, only few terms ingrained in political culture are as ambiguous, pliable and polymorphous as the word totalitarianism. The word totalitarianism is part of the lexicon of all political trends and ideologies, nevertheless, throughout this article we will approximate to one particular usage; the one performed by a sector of argentine contemporary right-wings. More specifically, catholic right-wing with corporate tendency and, within it, the perspective created (in articles written from 1918, foregathered as books during the early 1940’s) by monsignor Gustavo Franceschi, an acknowledged social catholic intellectual.
A great deal of ideological debates and political positions of XX century were associated to the use of the concept of totalitarianism. This usage, often abuse, developed an instrumental significance which was entangled in a petty comparative game between its different interpretations, along with a perception that diminished, or highlighted, nuances depending upon the interests or social status of who was using it. As stated by Enzo Traverso, only few terms ingrained in political culture are as ambiguous, pliable and polymorphous as the word totalitarianism. The word totalitarianism is part of the lexicon of all political trends and ideologies, nevertheless, throughout this article we will approximate to one particular usage; the one performed by a sector of argentine contemporary right-wings. More specifically, catholic right-wing with corporate tendency and, within it, the perspective created (in articles written from 1918, foregathered as books during the early 1940’s) by monsignor Gustavo Franceschi, an acknowledged social catholic intellectual.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
