Dimensionalidad del Inventario de Afrontamiento para adolescentes y universitarios
; Ongarato, Paula
; Fernandez Liporace, Maria Mercedes 
Otros responsables
Fecha
01/2011
Editorial
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
Revista
Psicothema
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0214-9915
eISSN
1886-144X
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
La evaluación del afrontamiento es objeto de controversia, no habiendo al día de hoy consenso sobre su dimensionalidad. Se presenta una versión abreviada para adolescentes y universitarios del Coping Responses Inventory-Youth Form de Moos. El estudio psicométrico realizado con 1.160 estudiantes argentinos incluyó: a) estadísticos descriptivos, b) análisis factorial confi rmatorio, y c) estudio de consistencia interna. Se compararon tres modelos (unifactorial, bifactorial y tetrafactorial) en dos submuestras aleatorias y en 500 submuestras diferentes obtenidas mediante un procedimiento de Bootstrap. Además se establecieron sucesivos modelos anidados con restricciones progresivas en submuestras segmentadas por sexo y edad. Los resultados indican un mejor ajuste del modelo tetrafactorial, así como su estabilidad en distintos grupos.
Assessing coping has been a controversial subject and to this day, there is no consensus about its dimensionality. A short version for adolescents and college students of Moos’ Coping Responses Inventory-Youth Form is presented. Psychometric analyses performed with 1,160 Argentinean students included: a) descriptive statistics, b) confi rmatory factor analysis, and c) internal consistency. Three models (1-factor, 2-factor and 4-factor) were compared in two randomized samples, and by a bootstrap procedure carried out in 500 different samples. Nested models with progressive restrictions were also established successively in samples split by sex and age. Results indicated a better fi t of the 4-factor model as well as its stability across different groups.
Assessing coping has been a controversial subject and to this day, there is no consensus about its dimensionality. A short version for adolescents and college students of Moos’ Coping Responses Inventory-Youth Form is presented. Psychometric analyses performed with 1,160 Argentinean students included: a) descriptive statistics, b) confi rmatory factor analysis, and c) internal consistency. Three models (1-factor, 2-factor and 4-factor) were compared in two randomized samples, and by a bootstrap procedure carried out in 500 different samples. Nested models with progressive restrictions were also established successively in samples split by sex and age. Results indicated a better fi t of the 4-factor model as well as its stability across different groups.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
