Artículo

One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction

Sayer, Catherine A. ; Fernando, Eresha ; Jimenez, Randall R. ; Macfarlane, Nicholas B. W. ; Rapacciuolo, Giovanni ; Böhm, Monika ; Brooks, Thomas M. ; Contreras-MacBeath, Topiltzin ; Cox, Neil A. ; Harrison, Ian ; Hoffmann, Michael ; Jenkins, Richard ; Smith, Kevin G. ; Vié, Jean Christophe ; Abbott, John C. ; Allen, David J. ; Allen, Gerald R. ; Barrios, Violeta ; Boudot, Jean Pierre ; Carrizo, Savrina F. ; Charvet, Patricia ; Clausnitzer, Viola ; Congiu, Leonardo ; Crandall, Keith A. ; Cumberlidge, Neil ; Lozano, Federico Icon; Watanabe, Katsutoshi ; Westrip, James R. S. ; Wright, Emma G. E. ; Zhang, E. ; Darwall, William R. T.

Otros responsables

Fecha

01/2025

Editorial

Nature Publishing Group

Revista

Nature

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

0028-0836

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Palabras clave

Resumen

Freshwater ecosystems are highly biodiverse1 and important for livelihoods and economic development2, but are under substantial stress3. To date, comprehensive global assessments of extinction risk have not included any speciose groups primarily living in freshwaters. Consequently, data from predominantly terrestrial tetrapods4,5 are used to guide environmental policy6 and conservation prioritization7, whereas recent proposals for target setting in freshwaters use abiotic factors8–13. However, there is evidence14–17 that such data are insufcient to represent the needs of freshwater species and achieve biodiversity goals18,19. Here we present the results of a multi-taxon global freshwater fauna assessment for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species covering 23,496 decapod crustaceans, fshes and odonates, fnding that one-quarter are threatened with extinction. Prevalent threats include pollution, dams and water extraction, agriculture and invasive species, with overharvesting also driving extinctions. We also examined the degree of surrogacy of both threatened tetrapods and freshwater abiotic factors (water stress and nitrogen) for threatened freshwater species. Threatened tetrapods are good surrogates when prioritizing sites to maximize rarity-weighted richness, but poorer when prioritizing based on the most range-restricted species. However, they are much better surrogates than abiotic factors, which perform worse than random. Thus, although global priority regions identifed for tetrapod conservation are broadly refective of those for freshwater faunas, given diferences in key threats and habitats, meeting the needs of tetrapods cannot be assumed sufcient to conserve freshwater species at local scales.

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa