Fuentes con atribución nominal en Consencio

Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2017
Editorial
Editrice Morcelliana
Revista
Maia
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0025-0538
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Las obras gramaticales más importantes entre los siglos II a. C. y II d. C. se conservan fragmentariamente en las artes grammaticae de los s. III-VI, aunque con alteraciones considerables y muy difíciles de valorar sin un conocimiento profundo de los mecanismos de transmisión de doctrina. El cabal conocimiento de la tradición gramatical antigua depende de una interpretación adecuada de esos fragmentos, alusiones y testimonios conservados, y para ello, es necesario conocer plenamente no sólo la fuente primaria (el autor que transmite la doctrina gramatical) sino también los mecanismos (modi citandi) con los que la transmite, a fin de comprobar la fidelidad del fragmento transmitido.El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las fuentes con atribución nominal ‒Varrón (s. I a. C.), Remio Palemón (s. I), Lucio Crassicio Pasicles Pansa (s. I a. C.), Valerio Probo (s. I), Emilio Aspro (s. II), y Arruncio Celso (s. II?)‒ en la obra del gramático Consencio (s. V), a fin de poder identificar sus modi citandi y establecer el grado de fidelidad a su fuente.
The most important grammatical works between the 2th century BC and the 2th century AD are preserved in fragmentary form in the artes grammaticae of the 3th and 6th centuries AD. However, they contain considerable alterations and are very difficult to assess without a complete knowledge of the mechanisms used to transmit grammatical doctrine. The thorough knowledge of the ancient grammatical tradition depends, therefore, on a proper interpretation of these preserved fragments, allusions and testimonies. To do so, it is necessary to know fully not only the primary source (the author who transmits the grammatical doctrine) but also the mechanisms (modi citandi) used, in order to corroborate the fidelity of the transmitted fragment. The aim of this paper is to analyze the sources named by name ‒ Varro, Remmius Palaemon, Pansa, Valerius Probus (1th century BC), Aemilius Asper (2th century BC), and Arruntius Celsus (2th century BC ?) ‒ in the work of the grammarian Consentius (5th century BC), in order to identify his modi citandi and to establish the degree of fidelity to his sources.
The most important grammatical works between the 2th century BC and the 2th century AD are preserved in fragmentary form in the artes grammaticae of the 3th and 6th centuries AD. However, they contain considerable alterations and are very difficult to assess without a complete knowledge of the mechanisms used to transmit grammatical doctrine. The thorough knowledge of the ancient grammatical tradition depends, therefore, on a proper interpretation of these preserved fragments, allusions and testimonies. To do so, it is necessary to know fully not only the primary source (the author who transmits the grammatical doctrine) but also the mechanisms (modi citandi) used, in order to corroborate the fidelity of the transmitted fragment. The aim of this paper is to analyze the sources named by name ‒ Varro, Remmius Palaemon, Pansa, Valerius Probus (1th century BC), Aemilius Asper (2th century BC), and Arruntius Celsus (2th century BC ?) ‒ in the work of the grammarian Consentius (5th century BC), in order to identify his modi citandi and to establish the degree of fidelity to his sources.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
