Sexo en las calles de Montevideo: Espacios disputados, reglas e ilegalismos

Otros responsables
Fecha
02/2026
Editorial
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Revista
Cadernos Metropole
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
eISSN
2236-9996
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
La oferta de sexo en la vía pública en Uruguay es legal desde 2002. La norma establece derechos y obligaciones que no se cumplen. El incumplimiento de la ley habilitó que un grupo de vecinas/os de dos barrios de Montevideo se organizara en pos de expulsar a las trans de las puertas de sus casas. En este trabajo se dará cuenta de las narrativas que este grupo construyó y cómo estas se montaron sobre los incumplimientos de la ley. La brecha entre lo que todos los grupos implicados deberían hacer y lo que realmente practican es analizado a partir del concepto de ilegalismos que es útil para dar cuenta de cómo ciertos espacios se (re)producen al margen del marco normativo.
The offer of sex in public places in Uruguay has been legal since 2002. The law establishes rights and obligations that are not met. Failure to comply with the law has enabled a group of residents from two neighborhoods in Montevideo to organize themselves and expel transgender women from the doors of their homes. This study approaches the narratives developed by this group and reveals how they were based on non- -compliance with the law. The gap between what all the groups involved should do and what they actually practice is explained analytically using the concept of illegalities, which is useful to account for how certain spaces are (re)produced outside the regulatory framework.
The offer of sex in public places in Uruguay has been legal since 2002. The law establishes rights and obligations that are not met. Failure to comply with the law has enabled a group of residents from two neighborhoods in Montevideo to organize themselves and expel transgender women from the doors of their homes. This study approaches the narratives developed by this group and reveals how they were based on non- -compliance with the law. The gap between what all the groups involved should do and what they actually practice is explained analytically using the concept of illegalities, which is useful to account for how certain spaces are (re)produced outside the regulatory framework.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by
