Deconstruyendo la república moderna: Momentos constitucionales y cambio de régimen en los Estados Unidos y Argentina

Otros responsables
Fecha
06/2019
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales
Revista
Papeles de trabajo
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
1851-2577
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Resumen
En este trabajo, me propongo sugerir una lectura paralela de la historia política reciente de la Argentina y los Estados Unidos inspirada en el modelo teórico formulado por el constitucionalista norteamericano Bruce Ackerman. Las premisas que sugieren la pertinencia de esta lectura son fundamentalmente dos: 1) que el modelo de la common law, que está en parte en la base del abordaje anti-formalista de Ackerman, puede ayudarnos a escapar a nuestros propios formalismos, es decir, a hacer más comprensible la heterodoxia de la inestabilidad política argentina de los siglos XX y XXI y 2) que el modelo presidencialista y federal que Ackerman asocia a su idea de "democracia dualista" puede resultar un segundo elemento de cercanía tanto institucional como de cultura política entre los Estados Unidos y Argentina. Los conceptos de movimientos, momentos y regímenes constitucionales de Ackerman nos servirán, así, para evaluar el presente democrático de ambas sociedades.
Deconstructing the Modern Republic. Constitutional Moments and Regime Change in the United States and Argentina Inspired in American Constitutionalist Bruce Ackerman’s theoretical model, in this paper I want to put forward a parallel reading of the recent political history of Argentina and the United States. The premises that suggest the pertinence of this reading are fundamentally two: 1) that the common law paradigm, which is in part the basic inspiration of Ackerman’s anti–formalist approach, could help us escape our own formalisms, that is, to render more comprehensible the unorthodox character of Argentine’s political instability during the twentieth and twenty first centuries and 2) that the presidentalist and federal model that Ackeman associates with his “dualist democracy” could become a second aspect of an American and Argentine common ground, both in terms of political culture and institutional life. Ackerman’s concepts of constitutional movements, moments and regimes will then help us evaluate the current state of democracy in both societies.
Deconstructing the Modern Republic. Constitutional Moments and Regime Change in the United States and Argentina Inspired in American Constitutionalist Bruce Ackerman’s theoretical model, in this paper I want to put forward a parallel reading of the recent political history of Argentina and the United States. The premises that suggest the pertinence of this reading are fundamentally two: 1) that the common law paradigm, which is in part the basic inspiration of Ackerman’s anti–formalist approach, could help us escape our own formalisms, that is, to render more comprehensible the unorthodox character of Argentine’s political instability during the twentieth and twenty first centuries and 2) that the presidentalist and federal model that Ackeman associates with his “dualist democracy” could become a second aspect of an American and Argentine common ground, both in terms of political culture and institutional life. Ackerman’s concepts of constitutional movements, moments and regimes will then help us evaluate the current state of democracy in both societies.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
