The Modal—Amodal Distinction in the Debate on Conceptual Format

Volver a la Vista simple
dc.conicet.fuenteindividual
dc.conicet.organizacionUniversidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"
dc.conicet.organizacionConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.produccionid8069097
dc.contributor.authorHaimovici, Sabrina
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T18:19:37Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T18:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-28
dc.date.updated2021-07-08T16:42:20Z
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I review the main criteria offered for distinguishing the modal and amodal approaches to conceptual format: the type of input to which the representations respond, the relation they bear to perceptual states, and the specific neural systems to which they belong. I evaluate different interpretations of them and argue that they all face difficulties. I further show that they lead to cross-classifications of certain types of representations, using approximate number representations as an example.es
dc.description.filFil: Haimovici, Sabrina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.identifier.citationHaimovici, Sabrina; The Modal—Amodal Distinction in the Debate on Conceptual Format; Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Philosophies; 3; 2; 28-3-2018; 1-13es
dc.identifier.eissn2409-9287es
dc.identifier.institucionalCONICET
dc.identifier.repoCONICET Digital
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/136251
dc.journal.ciudadBaseles
dc.journal.number2es
dc.journal.pagination1-13es
dc.journal.paisSuizaes
dc.journal.titlePhilosophieses
dc.journal.volume3es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institutees
dc.relation.alternativeidinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007
dc.relation.alternativeidinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/3/2/7
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/*
dc.subjectMENTAL REPRESENTATIONSes
dc.subjectCONCEPTSes
dc.subjectGROUNDED COGNITIONes
dc.subjectSENSORIMOTOR SYSTEMSes
dc.subjectSYMBOLSes
dc.subjectAPPROXIMATE NUMBER REPRESENTATIONSes
dc.subject.classificationFilosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnologíaes
dc.subject.classificationFilosofía, Ética y Religiónes
dc.subject.classificationHUMANIDADESes
dc.titleThe Modal—Amodal Distinction in the Debate on Conceptual Formates
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Miniatura
Nombre:
CONICET_Digital_Nro.313abe6c-1dfd-460d-bace-7c61f7f0ee50_A.pdf
Tamaño:
244.34 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Colecciones

Articulos(SEDE CENTRAL)
Volver a la Vista simple