An approach to argumentative reasoning servers with multiple preference criteria

Abstract

Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism of dialectical and non-monotonic na- ture, with useful properties of computational tractability. In dynamic domains where agents deal with incomplete and contradictory information, an argument comparison criterion can be used to determine the accepted information; ar- gumentation systems with a single argument comparison criterion have been widely studied. In some of these approaches the comparison criterion is fixed, while in others a criterion can be selected and replaced in a modular way. In this work, we introduce an argumentative server that provides recommendations to its client agents and the possibility of indicating under what conditions an argument comparison criterion can be chosen to answer a particular query. To achieve this, we formalize a special type of query which, by using a conditional expression, allows the server to dynamically choose a criterion. As a result, several properties of these expressions will be studied.