Notas para una política poscolonial de la traducción: Temporalidad y diferencia en Dipesh Chakrabarty y Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui

Otros responsables
Fecha
12/2022
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
Revista
Anuario de la Escuela de Historia
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
eISSN
1853-7049
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
En las últimas tres décadas los procesos políticos llevados adelante por los Pueblos Indígenas han repercutido fuertemente en las Ciencias Sociales y especialmente en aquellas áreas que tenían como campo de estudio las sociedades no-occidentales. Sin embargo, para la Historia con mayúsculas, la disciplina que ordena y clasifica los discursos sobre el pasado, la historia indígena sigue siendo un tema marginal. En este artículo, propongo un diálogo entre dos analíticas críticas de los discursos históricos, centradas en las nociones de temporalidad, traducción y diferencia, a partir de los aportes teóricos del historiador poscolonial Dipesh Chakrabarty y la intelectual aimara-mestiza Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Asumiendo los efectos de la colonialidad en el campo epistémico de la Historia y un interés en abordar la problemática de la temporalidad en el contexto de los pasados indígenas, el artículo, propone un análisis de las discursividades indígenas, no en clave de discursos “de origen” y “esencia” de sus posiciones, culturas o pasados. Tampoco en una búsqueda de su exotismo, o una supuesta exterioridad incontaminada, sino, en una confrontación crítica, entre esas discursividades y los saberes coloniales que sobre ellas se han construido en la Historia.
In the last three decades, the political processes carried out by the Indigenous Peoples have had a strong impact on the Social Sciences and especially in those areas that had non-Western societies as their field of study. However, for History with capital letters, the discipline that orders and classifies discourses about the past, indigenous history remains a marginal issue. In this article, I propose a dialogue between two critical analyzes of historical discourses, focused on the notions of temporality, translation and difference, based on the theoretical contributions of the postcolonial historian Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Aymaramestiza intellectual Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Assuming the effects of coloniality in the epistemic field of History and an interest in addressing the problem of temporality in the context of indigenous pasts, the article proposes an analysis of indigenous discursivities, not in terms of discourses "of origin" and “essence” of their positions, cultures or pasts. Neither in a search for its exoticism, or a supposed uncontaminated exteriority, but rather, in a critical confrontation, between these discursivities and the colonial knowledge that has been built on them in history.
In the last three decades, the political processes carried out by the Indigenous Peoples have had a strong impact on the Social Sciences and especially in those areas that had non-Western societies as their field of study. However, for History with capital letters, the discipline that orders and classifies discourses about the past, indigenous history remains a marginal issue. In this article, I propose a dialogue between two critical analyzes of historical discourses, focused on the notions of temporality, translation and difference, based on the theoretical contributions of the postcolonial historian Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Aymaramestiza intellectual Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Assuming the effects of coloniality in the epistemic field of History and an interest in addressing the problem of temporality in the context of indigenous pasts, the article proposes an analysis of indigenous discursivities, not in terms of discourses "of origin" and “essence” of their positions, cultures or pasts. Neither in a search for its exoticism, or a supposed uncontaminated exteriority, but rather, in a critical confrontation, between these discursivities and the colonial knowledge that has been built on them in history.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
