Artículo

In-syringe dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction vs. solid phase extraction: A comparative analysis for the liquid chromatographic determination of three neonicotinoids in cotyledons

Senovieski, Matias L. ; Gegenschatz, Sofía A. ; Chiappini, Fabricio Alejandro Icon; Teglia, Carla Mariela Icon; Culzoni, María J. ; Goicoechea, Héctor C.

Otros responsables

Fecha

11/2020

Editorial

Elsevier Science

Revista

Microchemical Journal

Título del libro

Nombre del evento

Fecha del evento

Institución organizadora

ISSN

0026-265X

eISSN

ISBN

Idioma

Inglés

Tipo del evento

Clasificación temática

Resumen

A novel extraction strategy for the determination of imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin in soy cotyledons by liquid chromatography was developed based on the implementation of an in-syringe-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction system, optimized through successive experimental designs. First, a fractional factorial design was built to screen the influence of five experimental factors: a) aqueous solution (water or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 0.20 mol L?1); b) type of solvent (methanol or acetonitrile); c) use of salt (yes or no) for the adjustment of the ionic strength; d) homogenization method (vortex or sonication); and e) extractant solvent (toluene or ethyl acetate). Afterwards, in order to build a response surface model, a central composite design was implemented considering the influencing factors. For the in-syringe-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction system, optimal conditions resulted in 1140 µL of acetonitrile, 583 µL of ethyl acetate and three successive extractions. Finally, due to fact that the system involves an evaporation step, a simplex-lattice mixture design was built. The optimum composition of the resuspension solution was methanol:water (60:40 v/v). The developed method was compared with a previously reported solid phase extraction methodology taken as reference method. Higher recovery percentages were achieved with the novel procedure, i.e. in the range of 69.5 to 74.2%, for the three considered analytes.

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Licencia Creative Commons

Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa